Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Gregory Chipman

Medical Oncology American Fork, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1457493967 CMS profile 202430

48 N 1100 E, Ste B, American Fork, UT 84003

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,655

664 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$42,500

8 holdings reported · through program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Gregory Chipman of American Fork, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,655 across 664 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $42,500 across 8 holdings.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 69th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

13 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,792 199
2024 General $5,633 160
2023 General $2,640 159
2022 General $1,692 100
2021 General $140 8
2020 General $279 11
2019 General $479 27
2024 Ownership $7,071 2
2023 Ownership $7,071 2
2022 Ownership $6,600 1
2021 Ownership $7,071 1
2020 Ownership $7,071 1
2019 Ownership $7,615 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Gregory Chipman
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Gregory Chipman were reported at $4,792. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Gregory Chipman Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $479 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $279 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $140 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $1,692 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $2,640 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $5,633 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $4,792 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Genentech USA, Inc. $3,315 17 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,435 100 payments
  3. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $1,225 67 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $829 37 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $783 73 payments
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $672 35 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $420 36 payments
  8. EMD Serono, Inc. $367 14 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $356 25 payments
  10. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $350 17 payments
  11. Other $4,903 243 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,510 644 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $2,205 1 payment
  3. Long term medical supply or device loan $1,196 12 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $667 2 payments
  5. Education $77 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KISQALI $1,482 33 payments
  2. ENHERTU $1,031 54 payments
  3. KEYTRUDA $661 34 payments
  4. SCEMBLIX $519 32 payments
  5. IMFINZI $432 19 payments
  6. IMBRUVICA $412 18 payments
  7. XTANDI $353 33 payments
  8. Lenvima $330 18 payments
  9. LYNPARZA $312 19 payments
  10. ZEJULA $304 26 payments
  11. Other $10,760 636 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

508

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$3,556,310

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

42.5%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 50 $786,045
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 51 $719,259
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 32 $497,237
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 31 $490,364
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 27 $398,003
Tasigna Nilotinib Hcl Brand 13 $258,477
Lenalidomide Generic 11 $220,415
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 12 $178,820
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 13 $2,937
Anastrozole Generic 88 $2,219

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 136 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,897,481

Of which drugs: $1,742,439

Medicare patients

244

Average age 75

Services billed

114,771

147 women, 97 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Cancer 55%
Arthritis 40%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Diabetes 29%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Depression 24%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, granisetron, extended-release, 0.1 mg J1627 Office 13 8,300 $36,501
Injection, aprepitant, 1 mg J0185 Office 17 15,210 $20,121
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 26 2,332 $203
Infusion, normal saline solution , 1000 cc J7030 Office 11 43 $86
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 14 59 $36

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 61 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENHERTU
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $294
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $20
$314 — —
KEYTRUDA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $201
$201 — —
IMBRUVICA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $144
$144 32 —
SCEMBLIX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $141
$141 — —
TIVDAK
  • Genmab U.S., Inc. $83
$83 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 61 with Patron

Records

664 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record