Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Gregory Beato

Internal Medicine Blacksburg, VA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1740312230 CMS profile 78646

810 Hospital Dr, Blacksburg, VA 24060

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,251

954 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Gregory Beato of Blacksburg, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,251 across 954 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,253 122
2024 General $2,264 138
2023 General $2,253 137
2022 General $2,384 155
2021 General $2,255 152
2020 General $1,581 101
2019 General $2,262 149

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Gregory Beato
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Gregory Beato were reported at $2,253. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Gregory Beato Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,262 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,581 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,255 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,384 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,253 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,264 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,253 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,707 168 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,316 94 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,139 100 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,134 63 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $924 62 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $842 54 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $756 46 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $473 27 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $418 23 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $408 20 payments
  11. Other $5,134 297 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,245 953 payments
  2. Education $6 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,883 113 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,425 93 payments
  3. FARXIGA $627 31 payments
  4. MOUNJARO $524 38 payments
  5. NURTEC ODT $496 46 payments
  6. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular;Metabolic Disease $491 45 payments
  7. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular $473 27 payments
  8. VRAYLAR $437 33 payments
  9. BREZTRI $434 21 payments
  10. Repatha $399 25 payments
  11. Other $13,508 854 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 103 drugs

Part D claims

4,413

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$493,215

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 90 $88,105
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 45 $75,050
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 59 $63,934
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 32 $31,948
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 22 $27,514
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 17 $21,548
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 21 $21,174
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 21 $20,868
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 23 $14,061
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 570 $9,682

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 103 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 65 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$167,608

Of which drugs: $73,782

Medicare patients

240

Average age 76

Services billed

4,539

110 women, 130 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Depression 31%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Diabetes 23%
Cancer 20%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 20 2,040 $39,560
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 41 41 $11,920
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 70 70 $4,459
Sarscov2 vac 50 mcg/0.5ml im 91322 Office 28 30 $4,354
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 19 19 $2,793
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 35 107 $519

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$205 59 —
RYBELSUS
$164 — —
Ozempic
$164 45 —
VRAYLAR
$116 — —
FARXIGA
$103 23 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

954 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record