Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Grace Tee

Internal Medicine San Jose, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1689691461 CMS profile 258433

200 Jose Figueres Ave, Ste 450, San Jose, CA 95116

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,480

836 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Grace Tee of San Jose, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $17,480 across 836 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,488 105
2024 General $2,316 106
2023 General $2,299 95
2022 General $2,666 147
2021 General $2,715 140
2020 General $1,944 102
2019 General $3,052 141

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Grace Tee
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Grace Tee were reported at $2,488. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Grace Tee Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,052 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,944 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,715 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,666 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,299 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,316 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,488 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,631 85 payments
  2. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,507 67 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,429 77 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,381 81 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $1,282 61 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,244 49 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,145 52 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,119 54 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $716 29 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $680 25 payments
  11. Other $5,346 256 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $17,155 801 payments
  2. Education $325 35 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XARELTO $1,382 66 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,333 67 payments
  3. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular;Metabolic Disease $1,182 61 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $1,174 63 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $977 44 payments
  6. Kerendia $680 25 payments
  7. FARXIGA $657 27 payments
  8. VRAYLAR $645 42 payments
  9. MOUNJARO $623 27 payments
  10. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular $565 26 payments
  11. Other $13,235 666 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 155 drugs

Part D claims

11,569

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,240,928

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

22.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 205 $246,500
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 108 $126,092
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 94 $103,391
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 91 $88,772
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 118 $72,095
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 56 $66,232
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 31 $56,921
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 30 $44,587
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 21 $37,399
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 31 $37,065

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 155 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 20 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$148,406

Of which drugs: $672

Medicare patients

385

Average age 76

Services billed

1,810

233 women, 152 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 58%
Chronic kidney disease 40%
Arthritis 35%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Heart failure 30%
Atrial fibrillation 28%
Osteoporosis 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 11 12 $263

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 34 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
MOUNJARO
$217 31 —
ENTRESTO
$137 — —
RYBELSUS
$128 31 —
Ozempic
$128 205 —
ELIQUIS
$111 91 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 34 with Patron

Records

836 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record