Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Glenn Zellman

Procedural Dermatology Phoenix, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1285611582 CMS profile 240049

2224 W Northern Ave Ste D300, Phoenix, AZ 85021

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,001,716

2,598 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Glenn Zellman of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,001,716 across 2,598 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Procedural Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $252,567 539
2024 General $180,852 521
2023 General $196,208 414
2022 General $125,874 346
2021 General $39,164 275
2020 General $56,747 173
2019 General $150,304 330

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Glenn Zellman
  • Procedural Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Procedural Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Glenn Zellman were reported at $252,567. Among 381 Procedural Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $592 and the middle half received between $144 and $1,778.

Show as a table
Year Glenn Zellman Procedural Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $150,304 $454 $152–$1,260 $163
2020 $56,747 $243 $90–$835 $114
2021 $39,164 $337 $102–$1,128 $132
2022 $125,874 $443 $119–$1,654 $149
2023 $196,208 $583 $137–$1,838 $160
2024 $180,852 $611 $132–$1,835 $164
2025 $252,567 $592 $144–$1,778 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $191,007 160 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $179,321 342 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $144,441 310 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $111,877 265 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $99,483 102 payments
  6. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $60,369 123 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $50,730 269 payments
  8. VYNE Pharmaceuticals Inc. $34,275 49 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $31,848 55 payments
  10. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $23,204 101 payments
  11. Other $75,159 822 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $752,691 282 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $79,956 28 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $72,524 377 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $58,635 1,885 payments
  5. Honoraria $37,410 19 payments
  6. Education $500 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $370,197 490 payments
  2. Bimzelx $110,464 187 payments
  3. CIBINQO $78,720 81 payments
  4. EBGLYSS $65,309 123 payments
  5. OLUMIANT $58,468 95 payments
  6. NEMLUVIO $47,040 75 payments
  7. VTAMA $30,109 129 payments
  8. SOTYKTU $29,263 50 payments
  9. COSENTYX $28,402 64 payments
  10. AMZEEQ $19,358 28 payments
  11. Other $142,721 1,393 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

1,431

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$793,131

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

15.1%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 14 $195,488
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 45 $186,548
Otezla Apremilast Brand 25 $130,932
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 34 $127,086
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 12 $83,413
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 12 $23,778
Jublia Efinaconazole Brand 11 $8,241
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 158 $6,964
Fluorouracil Generic 66 $4,702
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 98 $3,443

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 59 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$272,690

Of which drugs: $23,075

Medicare patients

951

Average age 75

Services billed

22,548

409 women, 542 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 68%
Arthritis 44%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Diabetes 23%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Cancer 16%
Osteoporosis 16%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg J7345 Office 81 17,400 $23,032
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 30 43 $30

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 34 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Bimzelx
$62,182 — —
TREMFYA
$45,648 14 —
OLUMIANT
$18,500 — —
LITFULO
$9,119 — —
VTAMA
$8,708 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 34 with Patron

Records

2,598 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Procedural Dermatology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record