Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Glen Biddulph

Internal Medicine Layton, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1518999275 CMS profile 548849

2121 N 1700 W, Layton, UT 84041

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,920

900 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$20,696 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Glen Biddulph of Layton, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,920 across 900 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $20,696 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,569 98
2024 General $2,297 139
2023 General $2,352 146
2022 General $2,264 156
2021 General $1,900 133
2020 General $1,246 97
2019 General $1,294 131

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Glen Biddulph
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Glen Biddulph were reported at $1,569. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Glen Biddulph Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,294 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,246 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,900 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,264 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,352 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,297 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,569 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,652 184 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,177 114 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $681 52 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $652 46 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $586 38 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $519 42 payments
  7. Astellas Pharma US Inc $517 31 payments
  8. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $490 49 payments
  9. Nestle HealthCare Nutrition Inc. $416 24 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $323 21 payments
  11. Other $4,908 299 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,920 900 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $925 84 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $826 75 payments
  3. UBRELVY $703 49 payments
  4. LINZESS $648 42 payments
  5. VRAYLAR $581 41 payments
  6. ZENPEP $568 32 payments
  7. XIFAXAN $490 49 payments
  8. CREON $468 28 payments
  9. QULIPTA $399 27 payments
  10. Otezla $323 27 payments
  11. Other $11,165 753 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 176 drugs

Part D claims

10,724

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$737,898

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

21.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 86 $64,686
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 51 $61,537
Abrysvo Rsv Vacc, Pref A And Pref B/Pf Brand 130 $39,623
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 26 $36,725
Shingrix Varicella-Zoster Ge/As01b/Pf Brand 171 $36,043
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 31 $33,117
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 19 $27,980
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 15 $25,294
Arexvy Rsvpref3 Antigen/As01e/Pf Brand 80 $24,172
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 25 $23,456

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 176 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 174 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$267,162

Of which drugs: $51,626

Medicare patients

472

Average age 76

Services billed

25,505

260 women, 212 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 48%
Chronic kidney disease 39%
Depression 39%
Diabetes 31%
Heart failure 26%
Osteoporosis 26%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 21 1,920 $38,899
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 34 34 $2,782
Injection, iron dextran, 50 mg J1750 Office 21 100 $1,247
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from recombinant dna 90673 Office 16 16 $1,227
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 30 640 $54
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 22 54 $47

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 45 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
$172 — —
Veozah
$140 — —
REXULTI
$131 — —
VRAYLAR
$125 — —
CREON
$116 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 45 with Patron

Records

900 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record