Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Gina Hanissian

Internal Medicine Collierville, TN Medical Doctor

NPI 1710053327 CMS profile 213097

574 Greentree Cove, Suite 101, Collierville, TN 38017

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$25,103

1,785 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Gina Hanissian of Collierville, TN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $25,103 across 1,785 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,915 240
2024 General $3,993 250
2023 General $3,688 280
2022 General $2,328 151
2021 General $4,159 310
2020 General $3,378 222
2019 General $3,643 332

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Gina Hanissian
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Gina Hanissian were reported at $3,915. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Gina Hanissian Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,643 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $3,378 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $4,159 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,328 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,688 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,993 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,915 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $3,620 273 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,919 124 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $2,769 278 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $2,140 182 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $1,398 71 payments
  6. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $1,219 84 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $832 49 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $802 54 payments
  9. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $717 70 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $681 58 payments
  11. Other $8,006 542 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $25,088 1,783 payments
  2. Education $15 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RYBELSUS $1,540 101 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,490 109 payments
  3. FARXIGA $1,379 55 payments
  4. UBRELVY $1,047 87 payments
  5. Otezla $944 48 payments
  6. JARDIANCE $943 92 payments
  7. Repatha $924 47 payments
  8. VRAYLAR $868 91 payments
  9. MOUNJARO $827 40 payments
  10. TRINTELLIX $780 48 payments
  11. Other $22,129 1,580 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 122 drugs

Part D claims

5,312

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$477,994

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

23.7%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 58 $61,565
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 41 $52,709
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 46 $50,066
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 45 $39,665
Abrysvo Rsv Vacc, Pref A And Pref B/Pf Brand 122 $39,268
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 35 $34,477
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 31 $26,466
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 21 $19,545
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 13 $16,472
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 11 $13,441

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 122 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 158 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$187,054

Of which drugs: $664

Medicare patients

454

Average age 74

Services billed

11,280

378 women, 76 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 50%
Diabetes 28%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Osteoporosis 17%
Depression 15%
Atrial fibrillation 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 39 137 $124
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 11 1,200 $111
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 26 258 $14
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 13 64 $12

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 41 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
$368 — —
JARDIANCE
$300 46 —
UBRELVY
$220 — —
Ozempic
$215 58 —
RYBELSUS
$192 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 41 with Patron

Records

1,785 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Tennessee

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record