Medical Doctor Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Gilbert Alligood

Adolescent Medicine Middlesex, NC Medical Doctor

NPI 1588644157 CMS profile 253380

7540 Middlesex Corporate Pkwy, Middlesex, NC 27557

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12

1 record reported · program year 2019

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program year 2019

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2019, Gilbert Alligood of Middlesex, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12 across 1 general payment and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 1st percentile of Adolescent Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2019 General $12 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Gilbert Alligood
  • Adolescent Medicine median
  • Middle half of Adolescent Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Gilbert Alligood were reported at $0. Among 113 Adolescent Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $165 and the middle half received between $61 and $402.

Show as a table
Year Gilbert Alligood Adolescent Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $12 $151 $36–$708 $163
2020 $0 $123 $24–$337 $114
2021 $0 $155 $54–$620 $132
2022 $0 $158 $50–$556 $149
2023 $0 $170 $52–$612 $160
2024 $0 $182 $65–$431 $164
2025 $0 $165 $61–$402 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $12 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program year 2019
  1. Food and Beverage $12 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 152 drugs

Part D claims

10,431

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$727,406

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 143 $128,986
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 91 $115,321
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 124 $112,110
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 57 $38,942
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 36 $38,816
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 40 $29,590
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 22 $22,410
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 15 $19,970
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 40 $18,042
Humulin R U-500 Kwikpen Insulin Regular, Human Brand 20 $17,768

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 152 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$53,163

Of which drugs: $9,398

Medicare patients

242

Average age 74

Services billed

1,093

99 women, 143 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 32%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
COPD 20%
Diabetes 19%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Cancer 15%
Chronic kidney disease 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 70 70 $5,564
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 13 13 $1,986
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90686 Office 12 12 $263

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

1 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Adolescent Medicine in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record