Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ghaison Serafini

General Practice Blue Springs, MO Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1801193644 CMS profile 308772

1501 Nw Mock Ave, Blue Springs, MO 64015

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,485

490 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ghaison Serafini of Blue Springs, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,485 across 490 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,111 58
2024 General $1,275 60
2023 General $1,079 54
2022 General $975 55
2021 General $2,002 126
2020 General $1,269 78
2019 General $774 59

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ghaison Serafini
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ghaison Serafini were reported at $1,111. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Ghaison Serafini General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $774 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $1,269 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $2,002 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $975 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $1,079 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $1,275 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $1,111 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,393 72 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $697 40 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $600 24 payments
  4. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $501 36 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $491 29 payments
  6. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $461 31 payments
  7. Amarin Pharma Inc. $456 27 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $449 40 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $344 19 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $297 18 payments
  11. Other $2,796 154 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,460 488 payments
  2. Education $25 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FASENRA $943 44 payments
  2. XIFAXAN $507 34 payments
  3. NEXLETOL $501 36 payments
  4. Repatha $501 19 payments
  5. STEGLATRO $435 39 payments
  6. Vascepa $394 22 payments
  7. JANUVIA $390 37 payments
  8. JARDIANCE $346 21 payments
  9. RYBELSUS $335 19 payments
  10. MOUNJARO $296 16 payments
  11. Other $6,508 395 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 106 drugs

Part D claims

5,431

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$392,475

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

24.2%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 63 $93,307
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 40 $58,101
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 31 $53,846
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 12 $46,819
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 14 $17,623
Janumet Xr Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 13 $16,834
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 14 $16,297
Nebivolol Hcl Generic 96 $5,261
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 469 $4,586
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 200 $4,500

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 106 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$110,963

Of which drugs: $4,512

Medicare patients

101

Average age 71

Services billed

30,851

48 women, 53 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 66%
Diabetes 34%
COPD 29%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Cancer 16%
Depression 15%
Chronic kidney disease 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 19 19 $1,391
Injection, depo-estradiol cypionate, up to 5 mg J1000 Office 11 100 $844
Injection, testosterone cypionate, 1 mg J1071 Office 14 28,111 $523
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 34 78 $410
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 16 42 $292
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 20 188 $179
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 26 432 $148
Injection, progesterone, per 50 mg J2675 Office 11 100 $56
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 31 104 $11

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FASENRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $298
$298 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $93
$93 — —
ELIQUIS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $87
$87 40 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $87
$87 — —
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $72
$72 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

490 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record