Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

George Keith

Internal Medicine Houston, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1598748873 CMS profile 72577

902 Frostwood, Suite 188, Houston, TX 77024

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$22,638

1,151 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, George Keith of Houston, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $22,638 across 1,151 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,912 166
2024 General $3,511 170
2023 General $3,543 183
2022 General $3,413 164
2021 General $2,878 167
2020 General $2,390 137
2019 General $2,991 164

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • George Keith
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to George Keith were reported at $3,912. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year George Keith Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,991 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,390 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,878 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,413 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,543 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,511 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,912 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $3,506 181 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $3,340 207 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,811 69 payments
  4. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $1,517 72 payments
  5. Grifols USA, LLC $1,328 55 payments
  6. Philips Electronics North America Corporation $1,016 78 payments
  7. Electromed, Inc. $975 85 payments
  8. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $868 36 payments
  9. Genzyme Corporation $851 27 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $763 28 payments
  11. Other $6,662 313 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $22,505 1,145 payments
  2. Education $133 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UPTRAVI $1,496 71 payments
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,471 80 payments
  3. OPSUMIT $1,469 70 payments
  4. NUCALA $1,453 103 payments
  5. Prolastin-C Liquid $1,328 55 payments
  6. FASENRA $1,208 55 payments
  7. OFEV $1,119 41 payments
  8. DUPIXENT $961 26 payments
  9. ACTHAR $763 28 payments
  10. BREZTRI $643 32 payments
  11. Other $14,095 754 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 135 drugs

Part D claims

8,096

Median for Pulmonary Disease: 936

Drug cost

$1,801,499

Median for Pulmonary Disease: $487,987

Branded share of claims

26.4%

Median for Pulmonary Disease: 69.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ofev Nintedanib Esylate Brand 74 $962,430
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 167 $170,546
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 111 $101,196
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 72 $83,654
Fasenra Benralizumab Brand 12 $65,975
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 50 $44,814
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 68 $44,387
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 23 $25,017
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 23 $24,927
Pirfenidone Generic 12 $24,000

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 135 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,233 Part D prescribers listed as Pulmonary Disease; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$183,258

Of which drugs: $8,849

Medicare patients

681

Average age 78

Services billed

2,832

384 women, 297 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Ischemic heart disease 38%
COPD 36%
Diabetes 34%
Atrial fibrillation 31%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Heart failure 29%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 98 98 $7,937
Influenza virus vaccine, quadrivalent (aiiv4), inactivated, adjuvanted, preservative free, for injection into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90694 Office 11 11 $834
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 15 412 $40

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
$505 — —
TEZSPIRE
$220 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$218 167 —
Prolastin-C Liquid
$200 — —
NUCALA
$195 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

1,151 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record