Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

George Baylor

Pain Medicine Salem, VA Medical Doctor

NPI 1093806192 CMS profile 140849

100 Knotbreak Rd, Salem, VA 24153

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$23,808

794 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, George Baylor of Salem, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $23,808 across 794 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,099 100
2024 General $3,294 95
2023 General $4,584 142
2022 General $2,724 116
2021 General $2,536 107
2020 General $2,115 110
2019 General $5,455 124

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • George Baylor
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to George Baylor were reported at $3,099. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year George Baylor Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $5,455 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $2,115 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $2,536 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $2,724 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $4,584 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $3,294 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $3,099 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $9,789 233 payments
  2. Medtronic USA, Inc. $6,465 151 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,167 106 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,107 24 payments
  5. Nevro Corp. $604 14 payments
  6. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $562 56 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $468 27 payments
  8. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $372 11 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $319 23 payments
  10. IBSA Pharma Inc. $265 11 payments
  11. Other $2,688 138 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $19,499 770 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $2,990 2 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,262 12 payments
  4. Education $58 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $3,606 48 payments
  2. ADAPTIVESTIM $3,100 19 payments
  3. INTELLIS Spinal Cord Neurostimulation $2,604 116 payments
  4. SYNCHROMEDII $2,029 39 payments
  5. INTELLIS Spinal Cord Neurostimulation $826 27 payments
  6. KYPHON EXPRESS II KYPHOPAK TRAY $812 27 payments
  7. INCEPTIV $724 24 payments
  8. UBRELVY $641 63 payments
  9. Accurian $602 21 payments
  10. QULIPTA $550 57 payments
  11. Other $9,621 421 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 43 drugs

Part D claims

4,808

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$360,685

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

34.9%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Qutenza Capsaicin/Skin Cleanser Brand 16 $58,088
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 35 $42,020
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 1,206 $33,144
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 48 $30,634
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 35 $27,891
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 905 $25,522
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 14 $24,868
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 36 $23,932
Fentanyl Generic 128 $13,888
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 358 $12,919

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 43 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 81 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$681,228

Of which drugs: $75,772

Medicare patients

1,395

Average age 68

Services billed

31,884

790 women, 605 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 39%
Diabetes 37%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
COPD 23%
Heart failure 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Hyaluronan or derivative, durolane, for intra-articular injection, 1 mg J7318 Office 11 961 $4,885
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 176 472 $2,560
Low osmolar contrast material, 200-299 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9966 Office 92 278 $79
Injection, midazolam hydrochloride, per 1 mg J2250 Office 37 120 $13

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ZAVZPRET
  • PFIZER INC. $88
$88 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $73
$73 14 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $73
$73 — —
Exparel
  • Pacira Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $64
$64 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $63
$63 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

794 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record