Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Geoffrey Potts

Dermatology Troy, MI Medical Doctor

NPI 1598052441 CMS profile 116830

1560 E Maple Rd Ste 200, Troy, MI 48083

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,517

326 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$232,409 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2025

Through program year 2025, Geoffrey Potts of Troy, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,517 across 326 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $232,409 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 81st percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $868 42
2024 General $1,417 66
2023 General $1,496 60
2022 General $1,164 60
2021 General $929 45
2020 General $2,164 30
2019 General $2,479 23

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Geoffrey Potts
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Geoffrey Potts were reported at $868. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Geoffrey Potts Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,479 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $2,164 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $929 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $1,164 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $1,496 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $1,417 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $868 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $2,918 11 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,014 59 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,570 58 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $589 38 payments
  5. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $459 20 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $425 15 payments
  7. LEO Pharma Inc. $406 21 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $288 15 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $228 12 payments
  10. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $209 13 payments
  11. Other $1,410 64 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,961 318 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $1,602 5 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $800 1 payment
  4. Education $155 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $1,545 57 payments
  2. SKYRIZI $664 31 payments
  3. HUMIRA $436 22 payments
  4. ADBRY $348 18 payments
  5. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $291 12 payments
  6. COSENTYX Dermatology $286 21 payments
  7. DUPIXENT Immunology $267 14 payments
  8. COSENTYX Immunology $229 12 payments
  9. TALTZ $228 12 payments
  10. RINVOQ $201 11 payments
  11. Other $2,805 134 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 27 drugs

Part D claims

891

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,434,424

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

18.1%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 50 $614,213
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 15 $338,373
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 48 $178,155
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 18 $150,031
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 15 $132,366
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 87 $5,305
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 93 $2,785
Ketoconazole Generic 127 $2,345
Glycopyrrolate Generic 21 $1,658
Calcipotriene Generic 12 $1,377

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 27 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$144,523

Of which drugs: $95,371

Medicare patients

202

Average age 67

Services billed

2,261

115 women, 87 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 34%
Depression 23%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
COPD 16%
Heart failure 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 18 127 $98

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$420 — —
ADBRY
$141 — —
COSENTYX
$118 33 —
DUPIXENT
$96 48 —
SPEVIGO
$80 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

326 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record