Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Geeta Patel

Dermatology Houston, TX Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1982925186 CMS profile 316760

3730 Kirby Dr Ste 601, Houston, TX 77098

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$575,438

2,467 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$50,735 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2023

Through program year 2025, Geeta Patel of Houston, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $575,438 across 2,467 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $50,735 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $241,404 641
2024 General $153,950 498
2023 General $144,616 469
2022 General $10,373 322
2021 General $8,618 282
2020 General $4,506 95
2019 General $11,971 160

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Geeta Patel
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Geeta Patel were reported at $241,404. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Geeta Patel Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $11,971 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $4,506 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $8,618 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $10,373 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $144,616 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $153,950 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $241,404 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $150,907 192 payments
  2. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $101,663 283 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $79,696 141 payments
  4. Genzyme Corporation $60,218 92 payments
  5. LEO Pharma Inc. $43,556 110 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $25,734 51 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $18,101 90 payments
  8. Organon LLC $16,878 30 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $12,225 238 payments
  10. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $11,182 132 payments
  11. Other $55,278 1,108 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $371,752 129 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $90,344 53 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $50,219 2,116 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $42,520 141 payments
  5. Honoraria $15,260 8 payments
  6. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $4,140 3 payments
  7. Education $1,195 16 payments
  8. Gift $8 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SOTYKTU $142,078 183 payments
  2. Bimzelx $77,610 117 payments
  3. DUPIXENT $51,043 94 payments
  4. AKLIEF $50,610 62 payments
  5. ADBRY $38,310 81 payments
  6. ORACEA $27,810 56 payments
  7. EPSOLAY $27,120 35 payments
  8. TWYNEO $26,913 33 payments
  9. Otezla $25,709 50 payments
  10. VTAMA $21,027 70 payments
  11. Other $137,180 1,880 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 15 drugs

Part D claims

506

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$202,175

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

10.3%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 18 $145,981
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 13 $48,057
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 38 $1,529
Metronidazole Generic 15 $1,201
Minoxidil Generic 86 $923
Ketoconazole Generic 58 $732
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 21 $715
Fluconazole Generic 48 $591
Ciclopirox Generic 13 $568
Ciclopirox Ciclopirox Olamine Brand 21 $458

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 15 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$178,270

Of which drugs: $49,171

Medicare patients

413

Average age 74

Services billed

15,602

265 women, 148 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 60%
Arthritis 42%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Osteoporosis 22%
Diabetes 17%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
Cancer 15%
Depression 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg J7345 Office 18 12,600 $16,830

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SOTYKTU
$58,333 — —
ADBRY
$20,371 — —
DUPIXENT
$8,709 13 —
AKLIEF
$8,330 — —
Bimzelx
$8,124 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

2,467 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record