Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Gary Becker

Internal Medicine Brooklyn, NY Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1164439964 CMS profile 7544

2035 Ralph Avenue, Suite B-2, Brooklyn, NY 11234

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$22,572

548 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Gary Becker of Brooklyn, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $22,572 across 548 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,006 99
2024 General $6,463 87
2023 General $5,420 66
2022 General $1,254 45
2021 General $2,023 110
2020 General $1,331 76
2019 General $1,076 65

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Gary Becker
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Gary Becker were reported at $5,006. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Gary Becker Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,076 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,331 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,023 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,254 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $5,420 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $6,463 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $5,006 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Mannkind Corporation $8,624 36 payments
  2. Abbott Laboratories $2,591 36 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,019 48 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $881 51 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $798 41 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $794 36 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $634 34 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $618 32 payments
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $567 26 payments
  10. Boston Scientific Corporation $516 5 payments
  11. Other $5,531 203 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,888 540 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $5,200 4 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $350 1 payment
  4. Travel and Lodging $122 1 payment
  5. Education $12 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AFREZZA $8,508 35 payments
  2. Ozempic $702 32 payments
  3. AVEIR $603 5 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $601 26 payments
  5. XARELTO $545 25 payments
  6. MOUNJARO $522 28 payments
  7. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $468 24 payments
  8. FARXIGA $444 19 payments
  9. VERQUVO $424 21 payments
  10. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $395 5 payments
  11. Other $12,782 475 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 134 drugs

Part D claims

9,219

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,520,429

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

24.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Afrezza Insulin Regular, Human Brand 105 $298,228
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 129 $156,502
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 126 $130,955
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 96 $124,249
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 69 $118,784
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 94 $108,081
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 58 $65,090
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 12 $64,521
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 51 $58,238
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 36 $40,763

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 134 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 57 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$157,454

Of which drugs: $5,027

Medicare patients

335

Average age 74

Services billed

4,153

205 women, 130 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 51%
Arthritis 35%
Heart failure 18%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Depression 17%
Chronic kidney disease 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 60 60 $4,899
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 65 130 $127

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AFREZZA
  • Mannkind Corporation $3,234
$3,234 105 —
COBENFY
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $125
$125 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $117
$117 94 —
LYBALVI
  • Alkermes, Inc. $116
$116 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $99
$99 96 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

548 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record