Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Garret Seiler

Infectious Disease Wichita, KS Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1255789566 CMS profile 2111981

310 S Hillside St, Wichita, KS 67211

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,844

80 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Garret Seiler of Wichita, KS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,844 across 80 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 71st percentile of Infectious Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $246 12
2024 General $397 17
2023 General $334 19
2022 General $177 8
2021 General $48 2
2020 General $160 5
2019 General $482 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Garret Seiler
  • Infectious Disease median
  • Middle half of Infectious Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Garret Seiler were reported at $246. Among 3,905 Infectious Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $188 and the middle half received between $57 and $766.

Show as a table
Year Garret Seiler Infectious Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $482 $190 $60–$862 $163
2020 $160 $124 $32–$606 $114
2021 $48 $148 $38–$905 $132
2022 $177 $166 $50–$834 $149
2023 $334 $171 $57–$787 $160
2024 $397 $176 $52–$752 $164
2025 $246 $188 $57–$766 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $251 5 payments
  2. Astellas Pharma US Inc $227 4 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $168 10 payments
  4. Insmed, Inc. $157 10 payments
  5. Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $132 7 payments
  6. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $127 5 payments
  7. Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. $108 6 payments
  8. Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $103 5 payments
  9. Hospira, Inc. $91 5 payments
  10. Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. $86 2 payments
  11. Other $393 21 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,625 77 payments
  2. Education $198 2 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $21 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Arikayce $157 10 payments
  2. MAVYRET $119 7 payments
  3. Xerava $118 6 payments
  4. NUZYRA $103 5 payments
  5. Epclusa $94 1 payment
  6. PANZYGA $91 5 payments
  7. CUTAQUIG $91 5 payments
  8. Fetroja $80 4 payments
  9. Vabomere $76 4 payments
  10. CUVITRU $73 3 payments
  11. Other $705 40 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 24 drugs

Part D claims

640

Median for Infectious Disease: 268

Drug cost

$60,661

Median for Infectious Disease: $217,595

Branded share of claims

20.2%

Median for Infectious Disease: 45.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Daptomycin Generic 29 $10,126
Ertapenem Ertapenem Sodium Brand 18 $9,010
Lopinavir-Ritonavir Lopinavir/Ritonavir Brand 11 $8,443
Rifabutin Generic 17 $5,353
Posaconazole Generic 13 $5,084
Cefepime Cefepime In Iso-Osm Dextrose Brand 11 $3,638
Ceftriaxone Ceftriaxone Sodium Brand 25 $2,903
Minocycline Hcl Generic 58 $1,941
Fluconazole Generic 14 $1,855
Vancomycin Hcl Generic 18 $1,605

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 24 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,546 Part D prescribers listed as Infectious Disease; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 42 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$802,422

Of which drugs: $614,806

Medicare patients

617

Average age 73

Services billed

115,961

307 women, 310 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 53%
Ischemic heart disease 52%
Diabetes 49%
Chronic kidney disease 45%
Depression 44%
Heart failure 43%
Atrial fibrillation 42%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, immune globulin (bivigam), 500 mg J1556 Office 44 8,250 $477,031
Injection, daptomycin, 1 mg J0878 Office 34 93,801 $3,921
Injection, ertapenem sodium, 500 mg J1335 Office 33 202 $1,816
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 22 796 $277
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 11 208 $47
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 20 41 $26

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Epclusa
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $94
$94 — —
Fetroja
  • Shionogi Inc $63
$63 — —
PANZYGA
  • HOSPIRA, INC. $30
  • Octapharma USA, Inc. $14
$44 — —
Arikayce
  • Insmed, Inc. $32
$32 — —
CUTAQUIG
  • HOSPIRA, INC. $30
$30 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

80 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record