Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Gail Kirby

Nurse Practitioner Greer, SC Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1760460869 CMS profile 10567249

108 W Church St, Greer, SC 29650

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,980

318 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Gail Kirby of Greer, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $17,980 across 318 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,904 70
2024 General $6,503 72
2023 General $7,382 76
2022 General $1,279 54
2021 General $913 46

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Gail Kirby
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Gail Kirby were reported at $1,904. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Gail Kirby Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $913 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $1,279 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $7,382 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $6,503 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $1,904 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $4,934 17 payments
  2. Horizon Therapeutics plc $3,905 34 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $3,423 49 payments
  4. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $766 33 payments
  5. OPKO Pharmaceuticals, LLC $638 16 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $589 28 payments
  7. Akebia Therapeutics Inc $586 19 payments
  8. Retrophin, Inc. $524 18 payments
  9. Calliditas Therapeutics US Inc. $483 15 payments
  10. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $349 20 payments
  11. Other $1,783 69 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,412 285 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $4,875 2 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $2,613 11 payments
  4. Honoraria $2,300 1 payment
  5. Education $780 19 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Fabhalta $3,938 11 payments
  2. KRYSTEXXA Krystexxa $3,905 34 payments
  3. FARXIGA $2,898 30 payments
  4. Kerendia $766 33 payments
  5. RAYALDEE $638 16 payments
  6. Auryxia $472 15 payments
  7. LOKELMA $406 18 payments
  8. JYNARQUE $349 20 payments
  9. KRYSTEXXA Inflammation/Rare Disease $273 13 payments
  10. TARPEYO $243 6 payments
  11. Other $2,595 97 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 51 drugs

Part D claims

2,121

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$497,930

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

19.5%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 137 $158,831
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 71 $94,199
Velphoro Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide Brand 16 $92,905
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 33 $38,779
Veltassa Patiromer Calcium Sorbitex Brand 24 $30,094
Lokelma Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Brand 40 $27,746
Rayaldee Calcifediol Brand 14 $16,616
Sevelamer Carbonate Generic 44 $8,609
Calcium Acetate Generic 72 $8,327
Torsemide Generic 153 $4,020

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 51 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$93,881

Of which drugs: $18,397

Medicare patients

509

Average age 75

Services billed

6,273

259 women, 250 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Diabetes 57%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 41%
Heart failure 35%
Depression 28%
Atrial fibrillation 26%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, epoetin alfa, biosimilar, (retacrit) (for non-esrd use), 1000 units Q5106 Office 22 3,272 $18,396

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 21 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Fabhalta
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $3,888
$3,888 — —
TARPEYO
  • CALLIDITAS THERAPEUTICS US INC. $243
$243 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $116
  • Lilly USA, LLC $96
$212 71 —
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $139
$139 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $124
$124 137 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 21 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

318 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record