Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Frederick Gaskin

Cardiovascular Disease Birmingham, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1790074854 CMS profile 1299577

833 Saint Vincents Dr, Birmingham, AL 35205

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$114,598

757 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Frederick Gaskin of Birmingham, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $114,598 across 757 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $19,414 131
2024 General $43,891 155
2023 General $43,103 177
2022 General $2,791 92
2021 General $3,173 105
2020 General $1,354 52
2019 General $871 45

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Frederick Gaskin
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Frederick Gaskin were reported at $19,414. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Frederick Gaskin Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $871 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $1,354 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $3,173 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $2,791 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $43,103 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $43,891 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $19,414 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $93,306 192 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $10,826 63 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,257 73 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,150 9 payments
  5. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $695 61 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $678 36 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $657 39 payments
  8. Innovation Technologies Inc $643 5 payments
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $626 41 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $620 32 payments
  11. Other $4,142 206 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $98,408 58 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $13,654 674 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $2,499 23 payments
  4. Education $37 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Repatha Cardiology $75,785 151 payments
  2. REPATHA Cardiovascular $17,522 41 payments
  3. FARXIGA $10,476 42 payments
  4. LEQVIO $989 57 payments
  5. General - Therapies $845 5 payments
  6. VERQUVO $821 48 payments
  7. LifeVest $695 61 payments
  8. Irrisept $643 5 payments
  9. XARELTO $626 41 payments
  10. ELIQUIS $437 24 payments
  11. Other $7,160 366 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 57 drugs

Part D claims

9,315

Median for Interventional Cardiology: 2,236

Drug cost

$2,005,432

Median for Interventional Cardiology: $380,412

Branded share of claims

28.1%

Median for Interventional Cardiology: 27.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 898 $851,256
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 315 $274,403
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 285 $244,382
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 222 $240,698
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 99 $84,643
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 69 $68,906
Nexlizet Bempedoic Acid/Ezetimibe Brand 56 $37,450
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 49 $32,725
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 47 $29,364
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 1,462 $23,017

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 57 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 4,694 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 123 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$220,985

Of which drugs: $25,029

Medicare patients

548

Average age 77

Services billed

9,084

266 women, 282 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 63%
Arthritis 51%
Diabetes 41%
Chronic kidney disease 40%
Atrial fibrillation 39%
Heart failure 36%
Depression 27%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 60 240 $1,418

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Repatha
$37,941 285 —
FARXIGA
$4,167 315 —
LEQVIO
$435 — —
VERQUVO
$163 13 —
JARDIANCE
$148 69 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

757 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record