Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Frederick Gahl

Pain Medicine Rockford, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1760443774 CMS profile 215178

2902 McFarland Rd Ste 100, Rockford, IL 61107

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,742

503 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Frederick Gahl of Rockford, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,742 across 503 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,298 93
2024 General $2,003 77
2023 General $1,528 65
2022 General $1,938 69
2021 General $1,819 79
2020 General $966 48
2019 General $1,189 72

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Frederick Gahl
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Frederick Gahl were reported at $2,298. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Frederick Gahl Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,189 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $966 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $1,819 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $1,938 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $1,528 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $2,003 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $2,298 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,591 53 payments
  2. Nevro Corp. $1,465 76 payments
  3. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $1,180 73 payments
  4. BIOTRONIK NRO, Inc. $930 29 payments
  5. Abbott Laboratories $919 39 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $895 23 payments
  7. Boston Scientific Corporation $649 16 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $370 19 payments
  9. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $356 9 payments
  10. Biodelivery Sciences International, Inc. $346 27 payments
  11. Other $3,040 139 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,742 503 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $1,210 37 payments
  2. QULIPTA $964 31 payments
  3. XTAMPZA $663 41 payments
  4. Omnia $564 28 payments
  5. NURTEC ODT $542 15 payments
  6. AIMOVIG $533 14 payments
  7. Senza $455 21 payments
  8. BELBUCA $454 28 payments
  9. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $446 27 payments
  10. Prospera $433 16 payments
  11. Other $7,067 342 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

580

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$19,685

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

36.7%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 19 $9,970
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 120 $3,148
Fentanyl Generic 17 $1,982
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 27 $1,031
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 22 $993
Methylprednisolone Generic 176 $748
Cyclobenzaprine Hcl Generic 36 $467
Tramadol Hcl Generic 105 $414
Acetaminophen-Codeine Acetaminophen With Codeine Brand 25 $376
Gabapentin Generic 21 $347

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 47 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$99,235

Of which drugs: $2,008

Medicare patients

229

Average age 74

Services billed

7,059

116 women, 113 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 34%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Depression 24%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Heart failure 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Infusion, normal saline solution , 1000 cc J7030 Office 129 215 $435
Low osmolar contrast material, 200-299 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9966 Office 131 1,137 $324
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 28 2,360 $236
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 169 313 $28
Injection, bupivicaine, not otherwise specified, 0.5 mg J0665 Office 25 1,765 $16

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $272
$272 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $122
$122 — —
BELBUCA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $114
$114 19 —
XTAMPZA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $77
$77 — —
RELISTOR
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $76
$76 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

503 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record