Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Frank Noodleman

MOHS-Micrographic Surgery Saratoga, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1285772152 CMS profile 57910

18988 Cox Ave, Saratoga, CA 95070

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,441

841 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Frank Noodleman of Saratoga, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $19,441 across 841 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of MOHS-Micrographic Surgery profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,200 122
2024 General $3,854 173
2023 General $4,088 168
2022 General $3,051 122
2021 General $2,281 115
2020 General $1,532 85
2019 General $1,434 56

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Frank Noodleman
  • MOHS-Micrographic Surgery median
  • Middle half of MOHS-Micrographic Surgery
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Frank Noodleman were reported at $3,200. Among 1,077 MOHS-Micrographic Surgery profiles paid that year, the median was $465 and the middle half received between $145 and $1,066.

Show as a table
Year Frank Noodleman MOHS-Micrographic Surgery median Middle half National median
2019 $1,434 $316 $106–$785 $163
2020 $1,532 $162 $68–$412 $114
2021 $2,281 $243 $87–$654 $132
2022 $3,051 $300 $102–$887 $149
2023 $4,088 $364 $125–$1,010 $160
2024 $3,854 $445 $142–$1,108 $164
2025 $3,200 $465 $145–$1,066 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,030 120 payments
  2. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,905 71 payments
  3. LEO Pharma Inc. $1,299 68 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,293 60 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $1,116 43 payments
  6. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $968 44 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $960 45 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $958 39 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $949 45 payments
  10. Incyte Corporation $779 47 payments
  11. Other $6,184 259 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $18,808 830 payments
  2. Education $632 11 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SKYRIZI $1,575 65 payments
  2. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $1,398 55 payments
  3. DUPIXENT Immunology $1,160 46 payments
  4. Otezla $1,100 42 payments
  5. TREMFYA $1,020 44 payments
  6. TALTZ $889 43 payments
  7. SOTYKTU $716 29 payments
  8. ADBRY $681 28 payments
  9. OPZELURA $673 45 payments
  10. RINVOQ $642 23 payments
  11. Other $13,606 622 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

2,008

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,234,082

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

14%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 42 $336,970
Otezla Apremilast Brand 75 $336,410
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 40 $206,742
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 13 $88,194
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 13 $87,148
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 12 $75,941
Enstilar Calcipotriene/Betamethasone Brand 16 $20,626
Vtama Tapinarof Brand 13 $19,214
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 285 $14,303
Fluorouracil Generic 135 $7,872

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 119 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$939,618

Of which drugs: $7,616

Medicare patients

1,850

Average age 76

Services billed

8,368

908 women, 942 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 40%
Diabetes 27%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Osteoporosis 16%
Cancer 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 90 194 $139
Injection, fluorouracil, 500 mg J9190 Office 11 13 $26

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SKYRIZI
$577 — —
DUPIXENT
$508 40 —
Otezla
$363 75 —
SOTYKTU
$331 — —
RINVOQ
$239 12 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

841 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record