Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Francis Walsh

Internal Medicine Cos Cob, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1124174347 CMS profile 323675

35 River Rd, Suite 200, Cos Cob, CT 06807

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,361

842 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Francis Walsh of Cos Cob, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,361 across 842 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $995 49
2024 General $2,103 105
2023 General $2,431 106
2022 General $2,100 112
2021 General $3,622 207
2020 General $2,548 161
2019 General $1,562 102

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Francis Walsh
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Francis Walsh were reported at $995. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Francis Walsh Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,562 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,548 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,622 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,100 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,431 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,103 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $995 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,161 208 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,508 90 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,060 48 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $768 41 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $576 30 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $498 18 payments
  7. Allergan Inc. $483 33 payments
  8. Eisai Inc. $415 48 payments
  9. Astellas Pharma US Inc $395 21 payments
  10. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $375 24 payments
  11. Other $5,123 281 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,191 832 payments
  2. Education $111 7 payments
  3. Gift $36 2 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $24 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VRAYLAR $1,260 61 payments
  2. UBRELVY $1,235 60 payments
  3. QULIPTA $1,179 59 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $985 45 payments
  5. FARXIGA $758 47 payments
  6. Kerendia $498 18 payments
  7. BREZTRI $483 25 payments
  8. XIFAXAN $375 24 payments
  9. Dayvigo $346 45 payments
  10. STEGLATRO $332 18 payments
  11. Other $12,596 676 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 217 drugs

Part D claims

29,169

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$1,043,429

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

15.3%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 731 $192,984
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 105 $120,710
Xifaxan Rifaximin Brand 15 $42,726
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 84 $41,089
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 76 $30,528
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 90 $29,592
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 109 $26,339
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 102 $26,059
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 34 $21,040
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 70 $20,345

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 217 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 55 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$336,475

Of which drugs: $10,951

Medicare patients

642

Average age 79

Services billed

7,461

357 women, 285 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Diabetes 43%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Depression 18%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Cancer 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 88 88 $7,200
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 116 417 $372
Injection, thyrotropin alpha, 0.9 mg, provided in 1.1 mg vial J3240 Office 26 31 $243
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 31 36 $230
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 59 81 $8

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
$323 — —
UBRELVY
$249 — —
BREZTRI
$215 — —
NUPLAZID
$134 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$111 26 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

842 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record