Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Forest Arnold

Infectious Disease Louisville, KY Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1134119472 CMS profile 187648

201 Abraham Flexner Way, Louisville, KY 40202

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,909

202 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,270

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$4,081,009 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2025

Through program year 2025, Forest Arnold of Louisville, KY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,909 across 202 general payments and $1,270 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $4,081,009 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 82nd percentile of Infectious Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $544 23
2025 Research $940 1
2024 General $762 36
2024 Research $330 1
2023 General $814 43
2022 General $659 39
2021 General $365 19
2020 General $238 9
2019 General $527 33

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Forest Arnold
  • Infectious Disease median
  • Middle half of Infectious Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Forest Arnold were reported at $544. Among 3,905 Infectious Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $188 and the middle half received between $57 and $766.

Show as a table
Year Forest Arnold Infectious Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $527 $190 $60–$862 $163
2020 $238 $124 $32–$606 $114
2021 $365 $148 $38–$905 $132
2022 $659 $166 $50–$834 $149
2023 $814 $171 $57–$787 $160
2024 $762 $176 $52–$752 $164
2025 $544 $188 $57–$766 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Astellas Pharma US Inc $867 31 payments
  2. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $616 36 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $451 27 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $439 27 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $373 21 payments
  6. Insmed, Inc. $321 12 payments
  7. Shionogi Inc $199 8 payments
  8. Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. $185 11 payments
  9. ViiV Healthcare Company $118 7 payments
  10. Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $71 5 payments
  11. Other $268 17 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,309 189 payments
  2. Education $600 13 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. PREVNAR 20 $374 22 payments
  2. Arikayce $321 12 payments
  3. COMIRNATY $279 19 payments
  4. DALVANCE $275 15 payments
  5. AVYCAZ $220 13 payments
  6. ZERBAXA $207 13 payments
  7. Fetroja $199 8 payments
  8. DIFICID $199 12 payments
  9. Orbactiv $171 10 payments
  10. TEFLARO $165 9 payments
  11. Other $2,284 141 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $1,270 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

727

Median for Infectious Disease: 268

Drug cost

$1,050,057

Median for Infectious Disease: $217,595

Branded share of claims

63.8%

Median for Infectious Disease: 45.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 116 $434,365
Symtuza Darunavir/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alaf Brand 39 $164,848
Triumeq Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudi Brand 44 $157,648
Tivicay Dolutegravir Sodium Brand 55 $113,451
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 30 $61,752
Prezcobix Darunavir/Cobicistat Brand 25 $57,872
Pifeltro Doravirine Brand 12 $18,686
Evotaz Atazanavir Sulfate/Cobicistat Brand 11 $15,743
Maraviroc Generic 12 $9,100
Atovaquone-Proguanil Hcl Atovaquone/Proguanil Hcl Brand 89 $6,915

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,546 Part D prescribers listed as Infectious Disease; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 12 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$10,862

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

53

Average age 69

Services billed

147

24 women, 29 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Depression 57%
Diabetes 51%
Arthritis 51%
Ischemic heart disease 49%
Chronic kidney disease 49%
Heart failure 43%
Atrial fibrillation 36%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cresemba
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $95
$95 — —
Arikayce
  • Insmed, Inc. $86
$86 — —
Fetroja
  • Shionogi Inc $69
$69 — —
DOVATO
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $31
$31 — —
AVYCAZ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $19
$19 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

204 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record