Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Farnoush Karimpour

Licensed Practical Nurse Visalia, CA Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1902248859 CMS profile 11134398

2611 N Dinuba Blvd, Visalia, CA 93291

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,405

45 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Farnoush Karimpour of Visalia, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,405 across 45 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Licensed Practical Nurse profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $633 15
2024 General $573 17
2023 General $100 6
2022 General $51 3
2021 General $48 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Farnoush Karimpour
  • Licensed Practical Nurse median
  • Middle half of Licensed Practical Nurse
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Farnoush Karimpour were reported at $633. Among 149 Licensed Practical Nurse profiles paid that year, the median was $39 and the middle half received between $23 and $109.

Show as a table
Year Farnoush Karimpour Licensed Practical Nurse median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $48 $29 $19–$120 $132
2022 $51 $35 $19–$122 $149
2023 $100 $51 $18–$125 $160
2024 $573 $53 $23–$139 $164
2025 $633 $39 $23–$109 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $345 9 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $312 9 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $156 5 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $125 2 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $123 2 payments
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $56 3 payments
  7. LEO Pharma Inc. $40 2 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $34 1 payment
  9. Abbott Laboratories $26 2 payments
  10. Virtus Pharmaceuticals LLC $26 1 payment
  11. Other $162 9 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,405 45 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. QULIPTA $273 6 payments
  2. MOUNJARO $214 7 payments
  3. UBRELVY $180 7 payments
  4. ZEPBOUND $131 2 payments
  5. AIRSUPRA $127 3 payments
  6. Wegovy $111 1 payment
  7. AREXVY $111 1 payment
  8. GARDASIL 9 $56 3 payments
  9. VAXNEUVANCE $56 3 payments
  10. ANZUPGO $40 2 payments
  11. Other $459 26 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 101 drugs

Part D claims

5,696

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$847,511

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Branded share of claims

27.7%

Brand-name drugs, not generics

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 105 $191,703
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 132 $126,892
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 103 $90,613
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 91 $55,247
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 42 $43,796
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 42 $40,469
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 42 $36,029
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 27 $32,888
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 23 $23,101
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 35 $22,932

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 101 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $198
$198 — —
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $111
$111 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $106
$106 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $34
$34 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $24
$24 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

45 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Licensed Practical Nurse in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record