Who Paid My Doc
Fabio Cappuccini
Gynecologic Oncology Orange, CA Medical Doctor
NPI 1255346763 CMS profile 11637
101 The City Dr S, Building 29, Suite 501, Orange, CA 92868
General payments
$313,051
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Research they led as principal investigator
$779,064
Through program year 2024, Fabio Cappuccini of Orange, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $313,051 across 293 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $779,064 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.
General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Gynecologic Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
6 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | General | $20,692 | 15 | |
| 2023 | General | $60,558 | 45 | |
| 2022 | General | $103,299 | 92 | |
| 2021 | General | $66,241 | 56 | |
| 2020 | General | $25,434 | 33 | |
| 2019 | General | $36,826 | 52 |
Beside peers
- Fabio Cappuccini
- Gynecologic Oncology median
- Middle half of Gynecologic Oncology
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Fabio Cappuccini were reported at $0. Among 1,179 Gynecologic Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $305 and the middle half received between $111 and $1,499.
Show as a table
| Year | Fabio Cappuccini | Gynecologic Oncology median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $36,826 | $287 | $113–$1,548 | $163 |
| 2020 | $25,434 | $223 | $59–$2,164 | $114 |
| 2021 | $66,241 | $193 | $68–$1,139 | $132 |
| 2022 | $103,299 | $252 | $90–$1,151 | $149 |
| 2023 | $60,558 | $281 | $102–$1,419 | $160 |
| 2024 | $20,692 | $308 | $108–$1,502 | $164 |
| 2025 | $0 | $305 | $111–$1,499 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Records
293 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Gynecologic Oncology in California
John Chan
Gynecologic Oncology · San Francisco, CA
Dana Chase
Gynecologic Oncology · Los Angeles, CA
Ramez Eskander
Gynecologic Oncology · Encinitas, CA
Krishnansu Tewari
Gynecologic Oncology · Orange, CA
Mehdi Moslemi-Kebria
Gynecologic Oncology · Upland, CA
Amer Karam
Gynecologic Oncology · Stanford, CA
Related records
Gynecologic Oncology in California
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Gynecologic Oncology
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in California
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.