Medical Doctor Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Everett Meyer

Hematology Stanford, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1508013517 CMS profile 23126

300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,103,458

1 record reported · program year 2021

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program year 2021

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$88,212 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2020

Through program year 2021, Everett Meyer of Stanford, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,103,458 across 1 general payment and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $88,212 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Hematology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2021 General $2,103,458 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Everett Meyer
  • Hematology median
  • Middle half of Hematology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Everett Meyer were reported at $0. Among 733 Hematology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,155 and the middle half received between $135 and $8,023.

Show as a table
Year Everett Meyer Hematology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $1,012 $122–$9,834 $163
2020 $0 $1,475 $115–$9,198 $114
2021 $2,103,458 $1,470 $125–$7,444 $132
2022 $0 $1,371 $139–$8,471 $149
2023 $0 $1,295 $147–$11,010 $160
2024 $0 $1,286 $146–$9,230 $164
2025 $0 $1,155 $135–$8,023 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2021
  1. Grifols, S.A. $2,103,458 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program year 2021
  1. Consulting Fee $2,103,458 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 8 drugs

Part D claims

195

Median for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: 228

Drug cost

$659,596

Median for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: $852,602

Branded share of claims

53.3%

Median for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: 38.4%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 30 $457,467
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 20 $199,678
Tacrolimus Generic 22 $971
Acyclovir Generic 31 $756
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim Brand 54 $426
Dexamethasone Generic 14 $261
Ciprofloxacin Hcl Generic 13 $32
Fluconazole Generic 11 $4

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 130 Part D prescribers listed as Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 9 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$32,034

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

63

Average age 70

Services billed

281

29 women, 34 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 63%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Arthritis 33%
Atrial fibrillation 25%
Diabetes 22%
Depression 21%
Ischemic heart disease 19%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

1 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record