Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Evan Lapinsky

Hematology & Oncology Newark, DE Medical Doctor

NPI 1134486046 CMS profile 2153611

4701 Ogletown Stanton Rd Ste 3400, Newark, DE 19713

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,634

82 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Evan Lapinsky of Newark, DE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,634 across 82 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 43rd percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $737 33
2024 General $284 12
2023 General $114 6
2022 General $88 4
2021 General $94 6
2020 General $317 21

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Evan Lapinsky
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Evan Lapinsky were reported at $737. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Evan Lapinsky Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $317 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $94 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $88 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $114 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $284 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $737 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $267 15 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $183 8 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $165 10 payments
  4. Genentech USA, Inc. $112 5 payments
  5. Incyte Corporation $88 4 payments
  6. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $80 4 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $74 4 payments
  8. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $62 2 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $48 2 payments
  10. Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc $45 2 payments
  11. Other $508 26 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,535 78 payments
  2. Education $99 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. POLIVY $112 5 payments
  2. IMFINZI $87 3 payments
  3. Fabhalta $64 2 payments
  4. JAKAFI $63 3 payments
  5. FRUZAQLA $62 2 payments
  6. Blincyto $53 2 payments
  7. CALQUENCE $51 3 payments
  8. KISQALI $49 3 payments
  9. OPDIVO $48 2 payments
  10. ONIVYDE $45 2 payments
  11. Other $1,198 64 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 24 drugs

Part D claims

744

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$1,206,070

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

25.1%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 26 $396,143
Lenalidomide Generic 26 $375,106
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 17 $259,843
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 12 $62,328
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 76 $58,220
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 44 $43,049
Anastrozole Generic 101 $4,916
Hydroxyurea Generic 46 $933
Ondansetron Hcl Generic 71 $827
Acyclovir Generic 19 $648

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 24 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 123 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$3,261,147

Of which drugs: $3,044,145

Medicare patients

615

Average age 76

Services billed

130,296

305 women, 310 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 53%
Cancer 46%
Diabetes 34%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Depression 25%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, daratumumab, 10 mg and hyaluronidase-fihj J9144 Office 16 14,040 $548,025
Injection, pembrolizumab, 1 mg J9271 Office 20 10,000 $447,720
Injection, fosnetupitant 235 mg and palonosetron 0.25 mg J1454 Office 38 171 $92,415
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 15 3,780 $76,952
Injection, eflapegrastim-xnst, 0.1 mg J1449 Office 13 2,640 $53,671
Injection, ferric derisomaltose, 10 mg J1437 Office 16 2,100 $33,402
Injection, leucovorin calcium, per 50 mg J0640 Office 23 2,198 $7,837
Injection, fluorouracil, 500 mg J9190 Office 23 1,487 $3,471
Injection, irinotecan, 20 mg J9206 Office 12 912 $2,077
Injection, oxaliplatin, 0.5 mg J9263 Office 11 15,790 $1,522

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REBLOZYL
  • Celgene Corporation $38
$38 — —
EPKINLY
  • Genmab U.S., Inc. $34
$34 — —
Fabhalta
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $31
$31 — —
MEKINIST
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $23
$23 — —
Vyloy
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $21
$21 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

82 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record