Who Paid My Doc
Eugene Son
Otolaryngology Omaha, NE Medical Doctor
NPI 1265724058 CMS profile 825929
Dept Of Otolaryngolgy, 981225 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198
General payments
$824
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Eugene Son of Omaha, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $824 across 16 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 43rd percentile of Otolaryngology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
5 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $35 | 1 | |
| 2024 | General | $56 | 2 | |
| 2023 | General | $168 | 3 | |
| 2020 | General | $203 | 4 | |
| 2019 | General | $361 | 6 |
Beside peers
- Eugene Son
- Otolaryngology median
- Middle half of Otolaryngology
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Eugene Son were reported at $35. Among 6,588 Otolaryngology profiles paid that year, the median was $317 and the middle half received between $125 and $815.
Show as a table
| Year | Eugene Son | Otolaryngology median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $361 | $194 | $82–$512 | $163 |
| 2020 | $203 | $118 | $42–$280 | $114 |
| 2021 | $0 | $167 | $63–$444 | $132 |
| 2022 | $0 | $216 | $84–$545 | $149 |
| 2023 | $168 | $235 | $93–$588 | $160 |
| 2024 | $56 | $280 | $111–$699 | $164 |
| 2025 | $35 | $317 | $125–$815 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 7 drugsPart D claims
225
Drug cost
$6,396
Branded share of claims
34.7%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen | Brand | 65 | $4,095 | |
| Omeprazole | Generic | 62 | $739 | |
| Calcitriol | Generic | 20 | $518 | |
| Mupirocin | Generic | 24 | $419 | |
| Lidocaine Hcl Viscous Lidocaine Hcl | Brand | 13 | $279 | |
| Ibuprofen | Generic | 29 | $218 | |
| Famotidine | Generic | 12 | $129 |
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,296 Part D prescribers listed as Otolaryngology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Records
16 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Related records
Otolaryngology in Nebraska
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Otolaryngology
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Nebraska
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.