Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Esther Young

Neurology Rochester Hills, MI Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1740230085 CMS profile 33344

633 South Blvd E Ste 1300, Rochester Hills, MI 48307

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$75,748

1,082 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$6,349

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$536,196 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Esther Young of Rochester Hills, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $75,748 across 1,082 general payments and $6,349 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $536,196 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,327 161
2024 General $2,675 168
2023 General $2,419 178
2022 General $10,313 171
2021 General $10,570 103
2021 Research $6,349 1
2020 General $23,426 109
2019 General $24,018 192

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Esther Young
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Esther Young were reported at $2,327. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Esther Young Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $24,018 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $23,426 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $10,570 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $10,313 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $2,419 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $2,675 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $2,327 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $18,850 54 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $12,183 265 payments
  3. Allergan Inc. $11,979 51 payments
  4. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $8,092 17 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $7,033 25 payments
  6. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $3,152 6 payments
  7. Celgene Corporation $2,718 86 payments
  8. Biogen, Inc. $2,570 29 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $2,009 149 payments
  10. EMD Serono, Inc. $812 46 payments
  11. Other $6,349 354 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $45,781 27 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $16,240 1,024 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $11,340 9 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $2,146 17 payments
  5. Education $241 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $11,632 26 payments
  2. NURTEC ODT $11,244 23 payments
  3. AJOVY Central Nervous System $10,350 28 payments
  4. Ajovy Central Nervous System $8,316 18 payments
  5. MAYZENT $5,520 38 payments
  6. AUBAGIO Multiple Sclerosis $4,998 12 payments
  7. ZEPOSIA $2,743 87 payments
  8. ARZERRA $2,588 4 payments
  9. AUBAGIO Neurology $1,912 6 payments
  10. KESIMPTA $1,902 42 payments
  11. Other $12,944 877 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $6,349 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 71 drugs

Part D claims

4,349

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,972,240

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

25.9%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mayzent Siponimod Brand 11 $324,467
Aubagio Teriflunomide Brand 15 $174,706
Vumerity Diroximel Fumarate Brand 18 $151,629
Avonex Pen (4 Pack) Interferon Beta-1a Brand 19 $147,659
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 17 $116,174
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 22 $111,515
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 12 $97,179
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 11 $94,170
Teriflunomide Generic 58 $80,897
Glatiramer Acetate Generic 34 $75,609

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 71 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 39 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$243,744

Of which drugs: $21,974

Medicare patients

1,177

Average age 76

Services billed

7,652

708 women, 469 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 60%
Ischemic heart disease 45%
Diabetes 38%
Depression 38%
Chronic kidney disease 37%
Alzheimer's or dementia 34%
Atrial fibrillation 31%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KESIMPTA
$489 11 —
ZEPOSIA
$396 — —
Rystiggo
$171 — —
WAKIX
$170 — —
BRIUMVI
$147 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,083 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record