Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Erin Hodges

Dermatology Matthews, NC Medical Doctor

NPI 1447660964 CMS profile 1031121

630 Matthews Township Pkwy, Matthews, NC 28105

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,574

379 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$91,460 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Erin Hodges of Matthews, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,574 across 379 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $91,460 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 76th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,392 121
2024 General $2,033 75
2023 General $693 28
2022 General $900 28
2021 General $42 3
2020 General $378 14
2019 General $2,136 110

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Erin Hodges
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Erin Hodges were reported at $2,392. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Erin Hodges Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,136 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $378 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $42 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $900 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $693 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $2,033 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $2,392 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,628 82 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,330 50 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,139 53 payments
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $649 34 payments
  5. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $562 18 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $474 26 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $431 13 payments
  8. Celgene Corporation $326 20 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $297 14 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $284 7 payments
  11. Other $1,454 62 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,157 373 payments
  2. Education $418 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $1,412 51 payments
  2. LITFULO $628 32 payments
  3. SKYRIZI $588 35 payments
  4. HUMIRA $562 30 payments
  5. CIBINQO $463 34 payments
  6. ILUMYA $459 30 payments
  7. RINVOQ $443 15 payments
  8. DUPIXENT $438 9 payments
  9. EUCRISA $350 23 payments
  10. TALTZ $334 24 payments
  11. Other $3,983 187 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

738

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$165,569

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

8.7%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 11 $101,651
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 13 $49,651
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 106 $4,525
Tacrolimus Generic 18 $1,875
Ketoconazole Generic 108 $1,767
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 58 $989
Fluocinolone Acetonide Oil Generic 12 $867
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 20 $819
Metronidazole Generic 11 $672
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 115 $646

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 37 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$132,670

Of which drugs: $13

Medicare patients

581

Average age 75

Services billed

2,556

334 women, 247 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 60%
Arthritis 41%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Diabetes 21%
Osteoporosis 20%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Depression 18%
Cancer 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 11 20 $13

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $527
$527 — —
LITFULO
  • PFIZER INC. $288
$288 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $195
$195 — —
ILUMYA
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $168
$168 — —
CIBINQO
  • PFIZER INC. $164
$164 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

379 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record