Medical Doctor Program year 2022 Reported 2019–2022 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Erik Berger

Sports Medicine Soldotna, AK Medical Doctor

NPI 1003120502 CMS profile 1132107

247 N Fireweed St Ste A, Suite 6250, Soldotna, AK 99669

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,354

75 records reported · program years 2019–2022

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2022

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2022, Erik Berger of Soldotna, AK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,354 across 75 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 77th percentile of Sports Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2022 General $134 4
2021 General $253 10
2020 General $283 17
2019 General $683 44

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Erik Berger
  • Sports Medicine median
  • Middle half of Sports Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Erik Berger were reported at $0. Among 132 Sports Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $99 and the middle half received between $33 and $256.

Show as a table
Year Erik Berger Sports Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $683 $131 $46–$324 $163
2020 $283 $96 $34–$276 $114
2021 $253 $120 $33–$421 $132
2022 $134 $107 $31–$274 $149
2023 $0 $63 $25–$180 $160
2024 $0 $104 $28–$282 $164
2025 $0 $99 $33–$256 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Tris Pharma Inc $255 6 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $195 14 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $102 7 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $98 7 payments
  5. Amarin Pharma Inc. $85 4 payments
  6. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $68 4 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $57 4 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $56 4 payments
  9. Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $54 2 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $53 2 payments
  11. Other $331 21 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Food and Beverage $1,354 75 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. FARXIGA $141 10 payments
  2. Dyanavel XR $140 3 payments
  3. Quillivant $91 2 payments
  4. Vascepa $85 4 payments
  5. XARELTO $68 4 payments
  6. INVOKANA $68 4 payments
  7. Tresiba $65 5 payments
  8. EMGALITY $61 4 payments
  9. ELIQUIS $56 4 payments
  10. Victoza $52 4 payments
  11. Other $1,012 63 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 108 drugs

Part D claims

5,030

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$506,881

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 119 $120,611
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 75 $104,834
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 60 $92,709
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 26 $34,818
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 16 $21,331
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 15 $19,898
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 15 $16,288
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 14 $11,504
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 14 $9,734
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 301 $3,283

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 108 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 49 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$108,976

Of which drugs: $2,911

Medicare patients

743

Average age 75

Services billed

2,483

334 women, 409 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 51%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Diabetes 31%
Atrial fibrillation 22%
Depression 22%
Heart failure 19%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 20 84 $56

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

75 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record