Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Erica Heagy

Nurse Practitioner, Family Anchorage, AK Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1134218720 CMS profile 10888050

3851 Piper St Ste U466, Anchorage, AK 99508

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$249,046

536 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Erica Heagy of Anchorage, AK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $249,046 across 536 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,423 33
2024 General $134,697 255
2023 General $52,654 116
2022 General $42,863 97
2021 General $16,409 35

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Erica Heagy
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Erica Heagy were reported at $2,423. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Erica Heagy Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $16,409 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $42,863 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $52,654 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $134,697 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $2,423 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $83,634 123 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $46,234 123 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $44,019 103 payments
  4. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $21,183 39 payments
  5. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $20,860 61 payments
  6. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $14,651 45 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $5,898 9 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $5,808 8 payments
  9. Eli Lilly and Company $4,841 11 payments
  10. Celltrion USA Inc. $1,020 1 payment
  11. Other $898 13 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $147,926 108 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $78,243 196 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $12,683 19 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $10,088 210 payments
  5. Education $107 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. STELARA $102,915 159 payments
  2. TREMFYA $60,705 85 payments
  3. OMVOH $23,930 70 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $15,503 38 payments
  5. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $14,339 25 payments
  6. ENTYVIO $12,520 41 payments
  7. RINVOQ $10,048 29 payments
  8. HUMIRA $8,786 22 payments
  9. CREON $8,202 25 payments
  10. DUPIXENT Immunology $5,808 8 payments
  11. Other $6,090 49 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

920

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$573,324

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

31.1%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 27 $231,812
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 11 $89,553
Xifaxan Rifaximin Brand 28 $83,350
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 29 $54,541
Mesalamine Generic 58 $35,708
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 19 $26,881
Dexlansoprazole Dr Dexlansoprazole Brand 22 $12,611
Apriso Mesalamine Brand 17 $11,954
Budesonide Dr Budesonide Brand 32 $6,087
Sucralfate Generic 40 $4,399

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 7 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$25,902

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

326

Average age 72

Services billed

363

179 women, 147 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 43%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 29%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Depression 19%
Cancer 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $31,175
$31,175 — —
STELARA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $29,507
$29,507 — —
OMVOH
  • Lilly USA, LLC $23,930
$23,930 — —
DUPIXENT
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $8,416
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $5,764
$14,180 — —
ENTYVIO
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $4,867
$4,867 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

536 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Alaska

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record