Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Eric Schneider

Retina Specialist Nashville, TN Medical Doctor

NPI 1790949485 CMS profile 1154792

345 23Rd Ave N, Suite 350, Nashville, TN 37203

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$134,159

169 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$23

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$57,143

4 holdings reported · through program year 2025

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,900,888 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Eric Schneider of Nashville, TN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $134,159 across 169 general payments and $23 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,900,888 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $57,143 across 4 holdings.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Retina Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

12 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $12,472 23
2025 Research $23 1
2024 General $46,774 53
2023 General $8,063 21
2022 General $20,625 27
2021 General $8,427 9
2020 General $15,098 12
2019 General $22,699 24
2022 Ownership $14,286 1
2021 Ownership $14,286 1
2020 Ownership $14,286 1
2019 Ownership $14,286 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Eric Schneider
  • Retina Specialist median
  • Middle half of Retina Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Eric Schneider were reported at $12,472. Among 1,235 Retina Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $175 and $1,079.

Show as a table
Year Eric Schneider Retina Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $22,699 $410 $157–$1,517 $163
2020 $15,098 $168 $65–$778 $114
2021 $8,427 $258 $101–$1,161 $132
2022 $20,625 $418 $162–$1,488 $149
2023 $8,063 $476 $178–$1,312 $160
2024 $46,774 $520 $188–$1,372 $164
2025 $12,472 $457 $175–$1,079 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. $63,382 26 payments
  2. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $26,526 25 payments
  3. US Retina LLC $17,564 8 payments
  4. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $13,820 27 payments
  5. Carl Zeiss Meditec USA, Inc. $8,787 6 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $963 24 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH $950 1 payment
  8. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $475 15 payments
  9. Genentech, Inc. $399 5 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $232 6 payments
  11. Other $1,061 26 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $90,959 31 payments
  2. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $15,450 7 payments
  3. Acquisitions $9,502 1 payment
  4. Current or prospective ownership or investment interest $7,262 6 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $4,646 111 payments
  6. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $3,900 2 payments
  7. Travel and Lodging $2,398 10 payments
  8. Education $42 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EYLEA HD $35,245 30 payments
  2. CIRRUS HD-OCT Optical Tomographer $23,471 13 payments
  3. CLARUS Fundus Camera $22,150 4 payments
  4. CIRRUS HD-OCT Optical Tomography $15,400 3 payments
  5. EYLEA $15,145 27 payments
  6. CLARUS Fundus Camera $11,925 4 payments
  7. FORUM $9,950 5 payments
  8. CLARUS 500 Fundus Camera $8,384 4 payments
  9. Retina Workplace $7,508 3 payments
  10. Clarus 700 $6,250 2 payments
  11. Other $53,682 112 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH $23 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

597

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$16,632

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

27.5%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 149 $6,529
Bromfenac Sodium Generic 19 $4,344
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 84 $1,158
Latanoprost Generic 113 $1,031
Ciprofloxacin Hcl Generic 71 $914
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 31 $804
Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth Neomycin/Polymyxin B/Dexametha Brand 57 $752
Tobramycin-Dexamethasone Tobramycin/Dexamethasone Brand 11 $577
Timolol Maleate Generic 29 $193
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 21 $180

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 45 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$4,334,424

Of which drugs: $3,715,907

Medicare patients

1,188

Average age 76

Services billed

42,131

685 women, 503 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 37%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Heart failure 19%
Depression 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 212 2,088 $1,354,881
Injection, ranibizumab-eqrn (cimerli), biosimilar, 0.1 mg Q5128 Office 182 4,048 $730,688
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 69 2,208 $577,889
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 72 21,360 $563,492
Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg J2781 Office 24 2,370 $277,474
Injection, dexamethasone, intravitreal implant, 0.1 mg J7312 Office 19 203 $26,088
Injection, ranibizumab-nuna, biosimilar, (byooviz), 0.1 mg Q5124 Office 18 135 $18,172
Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg J9035 Office 26 80 $4,043
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 12 16 $11

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $19,318
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $4,383
$23,701 — 2,208
EYLEA
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $4,239
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,422
$5,661 — 2,088
VABYSMO
  • Genentech, Inc. $235
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $71
$305 — 21,360
Syfovre
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $239
$239 — 2,370
DEXTENZA
  • Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. $212
$212 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

170 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Retina Specialist in Tennessee

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record