Who Paid My Doc
Eric Keller
Diagnostic Radiology Wilmington, NC Medical Doctor
NPI 1588056113 CMS profile 7220181
1025 Medical Center Dr, Wilmington, NC 28401
General payments
$3,179
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Eric Keller of Wilmington, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,179 across 37 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Diagnostic Radiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
5 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $959 | 18 | |
| 2024 | General | $1,688 | 14 | |
| 2023 | General | $120 | 2 | |
| 2022 | General | $261 | 2 | |
| 2021 | General | $150 | 1 |
Beside peers
- Eric Keller
- Diagnostic Radiology median
- Middle half of Diagnostic Radiology
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Eric Keller were reported at $959. Among 8,325 Diagnostic Radiology profiles paid that year, the median was $112 and the middle half received between $32 and $349.
Show as a table
| Year | Eric Keller | Diagnostic Radiology median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $0 | $108 | $29–$318 | $163 |
| 2020 | $0 | $65 | $21–$252 | $114 |
| 2021 | $150 | $92 | $24–$292 | $132 |
| 2022 | $261 | $104 | $29–$294 | $149 |
| 2023 | $120 | $110 | $29–$337 | $160 |
| 2024 | $1,688 | $113 | $30–$356 | $164 |
| 2025 | $959 | $112 | $32–$349 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 173 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$104,662
Medicare patients
1,759
Services billed
7,114
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 75% | |
| Arthritis | 53% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 40% | |
| Diabetes | 36% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 35% | |
| Depression | 29% | |
| Heart failure | 28% | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 28% |
| Drug given in the clinic | Where | Patients | Services | Paid by Medicare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 | Office | 31 | 2,935 | $317 |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
37 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Diagnostic Radiology in North Carolina
Related records
Diagnostic Radiology in North Carolina
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Diagnostic Radiology
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in North Carolina
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.