Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Eric Cheung

Hematology & Oncology Lakewood, CA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1881872687 CMS profile 131293

3300 E South St, Suite 305, Lakewood, CA 90805

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$39,836

1,511 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$136,638 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Eric Cheung of Lakewood, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $39,836 across 1,511 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $136,638 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $8,272 303
2024 General $8,637 290
2023 General $7,200 288
2022 General $6,037 252
2021 General $3,458 161
2020 General $2,573 43
2019 General $3,659 174

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Eric Cheung
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Eric Cheung were reported at $8,272. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Eric Cheung Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,659 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $2,573 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $3,458 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $6,037 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $7,200 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $8,637 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $8,272 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $4,487 138 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $2,330 120 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,778 79 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,753 55 payments
  5. Verastem, Inc. $1,705 2 payments
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,455 61 payments
  7. Incyte Corporation $1,363 54 payments
  8. Eisai Inc. $1,335 58 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,307 82 payments
  10. Celgene Corporation $1,247 57 payments
  11. Other $21,076 805 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $34,000 1,447 payments
  2. Long term medical supply or device loan $2,115 24 payments
  3. Education $2,041 39 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $1,680 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KISQALI $3,103 66 payments
  2. COPIKTRA $1,705 2 payments
  3. KEYTRUDA $1,369 57 payments
  4. Lenvima $1,312 57 payments
  5. LIBTAYO $1,185 25 payments
  6. OPDIVO $1,019 64 payments
  7. IMBRUVICA Oncology $941 35 payments
  8. EPKINLY $795 25 payments
  9. JAKAFI $784 38 payments
  10. IMBRUVICA Oncology $746 18 payments
  11. Other $32,916 1,496 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 63 drugs

Part D claims

2,836

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$8,811,594

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

35.6%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Keytruda Pembrolizumab Brand 77 $833,212
Reblozyl Luspatercept-Aamt Brand 45 $769,786
Lenalidomide Generic 51 $604,897
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 34 $494,324
Adcetris Brentuximab Vedotin Brand 11 $449,141
Cabometyx Cabozantinib S-Malate Brand 18 $448,385
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 24 $405,353
Lenvima Lenvatinib Mesylate Brand 15 $385,361
Opdivo Nivolumab Brand 31 $371,902
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 25 $369,473

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 63 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 79 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$865,359

Of which drugs: $672,896

Medicare patients

419

Average age 73

Services billed

44,538

240 women, 179 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 49%
Chronic kidney disease 47%
Arthritis 47%
Cancer 38%
Heart failure 31%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Atrial fibrillation 27%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 13 1,264 $113
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 13 62 $40

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 89 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KISQALI
$1,339 14 —
EPKINLY
$378 — —
KEYTRUDA
$312 77 —
Lenvima
$309 15 —
CALQUENCE
$293 34 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 89 with Patron

Records

1,511 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record