Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Emma Raider

Physician Assistant Chicago, IL Physician Assistant

NPI 1659903359 CMS profile 10579073

2418 N Ashland Ave, Chicago, IL 60614

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,735

379 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Emma Raider of Chicago, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,735 across 379 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,332 47
2024 General $1,685 67
2023 General $1,590 77
2022 General $1,911 82
2021 General $2,217 106

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Emma Raider
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Emma Raider were reported at $1,332. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Emma Raider Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $2,217 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $1,911 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $1,590 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $1,685 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $1,332 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,027 97 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $907 46 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $736 39 payments
  4. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $672 17 payments
  5. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $534 22 payments
  6. ViiV Healthcare Company $415 15 payments
  7. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $322 6 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $281 15 payments
  9. Corium, Inc. $272 8 payments
  10. Corcept Therapeutics $248 4 payments
  11. Other $2,319 110 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,703 378 payments
  2. Education $32 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. UBRELVY $1,055 55 payments
  2. VRAYLAR $695 29 payments
  3. NURTEC ODT $525 13 payments
  4. Qelbree $474 5 payments
  5. MOUNJARO $463 27 payments
  6. Ozempic $454 24 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $422 23 payments
  8. ZEPBOUND $351 20 payments
  9. APRETUDE $336 12 payments
  10. Azstarys $272 8 payments
  11. Other $4,563 224 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

379 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record