Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Emma Guttman

Dermatology New York, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1053556852 CMS profile 274339

5 E 98Th St Fl 5, New York, NY 10029

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,682,798

1,583 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$181,726

Paid to them · 167 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$33,613,917 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Emma Guttman of New York, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,682,798 across 1,583 general payments and $181,726 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $33,613,917 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

14 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $188,459 220
2025 Research $20,561 12
2024 General $191,349 276
2024 Research $39,537 21
2023 General $204,971 250
2023 Research $18,926 18
2022 General $233,196 260
2022 Research $32,422 30
2021 General $249,743 122
2021 Research $23,724 28
2020 General $298,233 113
2020 Research $32,638 38
2019 General $316,846 342
2019 Research $13,916 20

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Emma Guttman
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Emma Guttman were reported at $188,459. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Emma Guttman Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $316,846 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $298,233 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $249,743 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $233,196 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $204,971 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $191,349 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $188,459 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $258,244 189 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $227,411 128 payments
  3. Eli Lilly and Company $172,794 77 payments
  4. LEO Pharma AS $163,470 156 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $137,587 250 payments
  6. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $132,544 57 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $110,175 101 payments
  8. Incyte Corporation $51,792 117 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $49,199 54 payments
  10. Janssen Global Services, LLC $36,955 35 payments
  11. Other $342,626 419 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $1,228,566 375 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $218,966 88 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $134,297 330 payments
  4. Honoraria $75,601 32 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $20,868 757 payments
  6. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $4,500 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DUPIXENT Immunology $184,783 106 payments
  2. EUCRISA $83,824 67 payments
  3. RINVOQ $43,656 91 payments
  4. DUPIXENT Immunology $40,054 32 payments
  5. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $36,016 80 payments
  6. TREMFYA $30,540 35 payments
  7. EBGLYSS $29,770 12 payments
  8. LITFULO $17,881 20 payments
  9. CIBINQO $14,433 40 payments
  10. OLUMIANT $13,215 8 payments
  11. Other $108,126 337 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $100,680 88 payments
  2. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $53,455 68 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $18,091 4 payments
  4. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $3,800 1 payment
  5. LEO Pharma AS $1,950 1 payment
  6. Genzyme Corporation $1,750 2 payments
  7. Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc $1,300 2 payments
  8. Eli Lilly and Company $700 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 8 drugs

Part D claims

191

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$399,312

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

67%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 60 $294,756
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 44 $88,643
Zoryve Roflumilast Brand 12 $13,258
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 19 $1,860
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 12 $303
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 12 $186
Minoxidil Generic 19 $158
Ketoconazole Generic 13 $147

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Enbrel
$6,531 — —
TARPEYO
$5,000 — —
Otezla
$4,500 — —
Zoryve
$2,154 12 —
RINVOQ
$1,060 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,750 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record