Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Emil Annabi

Pain Medicine Tucson, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1295997179 CMS profile 331418

6840 E Broadway Blvd, Tucson, AZ 85710

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,151

92 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$4,500 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2023

Through program year 2025, Emil Annabi of Tucson, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,151 across 92 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $4,500 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 70th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,104 14
2024 General $2,631 32
2023 General $129 5
2022 General $1,077 9
2021 General $62 1
2020 General $384 8
2019 General $763 23

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Emil Annabi
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Emil Annabi were reported at $1,104. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Emil Annabi Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $763 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $384 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $62 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $1,077 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $129 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $2,631 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $1,104 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,853 37 payments
  2. Abbott Laboratories $1,487 14 payments
  3. Stryker Corporation $724 2 payments
  4. SurGenTec $641 1 payment
  5. Radius Health, Inc. $217 6 payments
  6. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $169 2 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $138 4 payments
  8. US WorldMeds, LLC $133 5 payments
  9. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $120 2 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $93 1 payment
  11. Other $578 18 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,440 83 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $2,711 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. OPTABLATE $724 2 payments
  2. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $701 3 payments
  3. ION Facet Screw $641 1 payment
  4. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $639 4 payments
  5. MILD DEVICE KIT $477 1 payment
  6. ARTISAN $280 4 payments
  7. Tymlos $217 6 payments
  8. SPRINT PNS System $169 2 payments
  9. ETERNA $147 7 payments
  10. Intracept $138 1 payment
  11. Other $1,572 50 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

762

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$31,625

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

36.1%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 20 $9,937
Buprenorphine Generic 50 $8,707
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 108 $3,059
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 96 $2,756
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 112 $2,080
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 51 $1,373
Tramadol Hcl Generic 72 $790
Gabapentin Generic 74 $705
Pregabalin Generic 17 $393
Morphine Sulfate Generic 19 $359

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$176,197

Of which drugs: $322

Medicare patients

672

Average age 75

Services billed

2,438

411 women, 261 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 35%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Diabetes 27%
Osteoporosis 24%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 71 352 $248
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 95 753 $65

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ROXYBOND
  • PROTEGA PHARMACEUTIALS LLC $17
$17 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

92 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record