Who Paid My Doc
Elliot Ho
Pulmonary Disease Loma Linda, CA Doctor of Osteopathy
NPI 1184044760 CMS profile 5697832
11234 Anderson St # Mc-15116, Loma Linda, CA 92354
General payments
$306,331
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Elliot Ho of Loma Linda, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $306,331 across 424 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Pulmonary Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
7 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $53,028 | 86 | |
| 2024 | General | $78,236 | 111 | |
| 2023 | General | $115,966 | 139 | |
| 2022 | General | $21,817 | 46 | |
| 2021 | General | $34,143 | 19 | |
| 2020 | General | $2,935 | 20 | |
| 2019 | General | $206 | 3 |
Beside peers
- Elliot Ho
- Pulmonary Disease median
- Middle half of Pulmonary Disease
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Elliot Ho were reported at $53,028. Among 8,914 Pulmonary Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $500 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,893.
Show as a table
| Year | Elliot Ho | Pulmonary Disease median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $206 | $377 | $109–$1,340 | $163 |
| 2020 | $2,935 | $230 | $56–$907 | $114 |
| 2021 | $34,143 | $269 | $68–$1,072 | $132 |
| 2022 | $21,817 | $390 | $100–$1,457 | $149 |
| 2023 | $115,966 | $419 | $114–$1,659 | $160 |
| 2024 | $78,236 | $476 | $123–$1,818 | $164 |
| 2025 | $53,028 | $500 | $124–$1,893 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$69,231
Medicare patients
224
Services billed
732
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 75% | |
| Heart failure | 55% | |
| Diabetes | 52% | |
| COPD | 51% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 50% | |
| Arthritis | 49% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 45% | |
| Cancer | 36% |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
424 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Pulmonary Disease in California
Related records
Pulmonary Disease in California
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Pulmonary Disease
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in California
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.