Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Elizabeth Saez

Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care San Marcos, CA Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1558819649 CMS profile 11182071

111 Campus Way Ste 103, San Marcos, CA 92078

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,206

68 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Elizabeth Saez of San Marcos, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,206 across 68 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 74th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $153 8
2024 General $347 15
2023 General $370 28
2022 General $285 14
2021 General $51 3

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Elizabeth Saez
  • Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Elizabeth Saez were reported at $153. Among 4,814 Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care profiles paid that year, the median was $169 and the middle half received between $51 and $499.

Show as a table
Year Elizabeth Saez Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $51 $137 $39–$445 $132
2022 $285 $139 $44–$421 $149
2023 $370 $163 $53–$481 $160
2024 $347 $176 $54–$511 $164
2025 $153 $169 $51–$499 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $225 19 payments
  2. Biogen, Inc. $156 6 payments
  3. Mayne Pharma Inc. $138 9 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $119 5 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $93 6 payments
  6. Myovant Sciences Inc. $78 4 payments
  7. Becton, Dickinson and Company $72 3 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $48 2 payments
  9. Hologic, LLC $46 2 payments
  10. Evofem Biosciences, Inc. $42 2 payments
  11. Other $189 10 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,206 68 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. INJECTAFER $225 19 payments
  2. MYFEMBREE Hormone Therapy $112 6 payments
  3. Zurzuvae $104 4 payments
  4. MYFEMBREE Genitourinary (Sexual Health);Womens Health $64 4 payments
  5. Veozah $48 2 payments
  6. Aptima $46 2 payments
  7. BD Onclarity $46 2 payments
  8. Phexxi $42 2 payments
  9. Phexx $42 2 payments
  10. Solosec $42 2 payments
  11. Other $412 21 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

68 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record