Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Elizabeth Peckham

Neurology Round Rock, TX Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1154533743 CMS profile 367743

16040 Park Valley Dr, Building B, Suite 100, Round Rock, TX 78681

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,162

315 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$224,072

Paid to them · 6 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$5,418,479 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Elizabeth Peckham of Round Rock, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,162 across 315 general payments and $224,072 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $5,418,479 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,285 79
2024 General $131 6
2023 General $698 48
2023 Research $410 1
2022 General $1,512 71
2022 Research $7,390 3
2021 General $623 33
2021 Research $216,272 2
2020 General $6,695 29
2019 General $3,218 49

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Elizabeth Peckham
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Elizabeth Peckham were reported at $2,285. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Elizabeth Peckham Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,218 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $6,695 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $623 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $1,512 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $698 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $131 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $2,285 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,824 31 payments
  2. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC $2,324 3 payments
  3. Medtronic, Inc. $1,621 48 payments
  4. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc $1,547 7 payments
  5. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $1,209 16 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $1,060 70 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $458 29 payments
  8. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $383 25 payments
  9. Genzyme Corporation $199 9 payments
  10. Medtronic USA, Inc. $189 12 payments
  11. Other $1,349 65 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $5,635 5 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $5,285 298 payments
  3. Honoraria $2,200 1 payment
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $1,056 5 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $977 5 payments
  6. Education $8 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RYTARY $2,324 3 payments
  2. DUOPA $1,941 9 payments
  3. PERCEPT PC BRAINSENSE $1,576 44 payments
  4. INBRIJA $1,524 6 payments
  5. KYNMOBI $1,018 2 payments
  6. INFINITY Neuromodulation $685 50 payments
  7. KESIMPTA $271 21 payments
  8. INFINITY Structural Heart $241 13 payments
  9. NUPLAZID $229 15 payments
  10. QULIPTA $199 12 payments
  11. Other $2,578 142 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $223,637 5 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $435 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 74 drugs

Part D claims

6,602

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,490,572

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

44.5%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 456 $524,169
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 53 $315,081
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 14 $119,437
Gocovri Amantadine Hcl Brand 51 $93,313
Tetrabenazine Generic 12 $64,505
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 49 $63,525
Carbidopa-Levodopa Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 1,408 $58,955
Nourianz Istradefylline Brand 16 $52,703
Neupro Rotigotine Brand 38 $51,277
Carbidopa-Levodopa Er Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 230 $19,805

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 74 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$300,229

Of which drugs: $142,223

Medicare patients

630

Average age 76

Services billed

32,885

314 women, 316 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 51%
Depression 39%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Alzheimer's or dementia 29%
Diabetes 26%
Osteoporosis 21%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 38 25,423 $126,505

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VYVGART Hytrulo
  • ARGENX US, INC. $24
$24 — —
Austedo XR
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $18
$18 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

321 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record