Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Elizabeth Peacock

Dermatology Muncie, IN Medical Doctor

NPI 1679968986 CMS profile 2789951

401 W McGalliard Rd, Muncie, IN 47303

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,001

357 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Elizabeth Peacock of Muncie, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,001 across 357 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 69th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,100 65
2024 General $1,235 75
2023 General $1,160 68
2022 General $967 56
2021 General $924 54
2020 General $423 25
2019 General $191 14

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Elizabeth Peacock
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Elizabeth Peacock were reported at $1,100. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Elizabeth Peacock Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $191 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $423 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $924 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $967 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $1,160 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $1,235 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $1,100 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,310 97 payments
  2. Incyte Corporation $587 32 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $585 22 payments
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $494 25 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $478 24 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $432 29 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $286 23 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $247 15 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $243 14 payments
  10. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $225 20 payments
  11. Other $1,115 56 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,813 354 payments
  2. Education $188 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $594 42 payments
  2. OPZELURA $587 32 payments
  3. DUPIXENT Immunology $563 27 payments
  4. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $545 20 payments
  5. SKYRIZI $528 43 payments
  6. EUCRISA $363 24 payments
  7. HUMIRA $311 21 payments
  8. CIBINQO $271 18 payments
  9. TALTZ $247 15 payments
  10. Otezla $243 14 payments
  11. Other $2,765 169 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 37 drugs

Part D claims

2,682

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$480,842

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

11.6%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 53 $202,694
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 32 $122,860
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 12 $91,130
Fluorouracil Generic 205 $14,458
Ketoconazole Generic 357 $6,097
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 124 $5,090
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 95 $4,720
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 339 $4,194
Betamethasone Diprop Augmented Betamethasone/Propylene Glyc Brand 105 $3,925
Ammonium Lactate Generic 176 $2,873

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 37 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 87 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$439,596

Of which drugs: $114,134

Medicare patients

1,477

Average age 76

Services billed

9,127

879 women, 598 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 27%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Depression 21%
Cancer 17%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 14 22 $6,820
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 28 61 $271
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 53 237 $166

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $182
$182 — —
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $88
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $88
$175 85 —
OPZELURA
  • Incyte Corporation $173
$173 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $108
$108 12 —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $86
$86 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

357 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Indiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record