Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Elizabeth Liotta

Dermatology Frederick, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1962583955 CMS profile 225473

77 Thomas Johnson Dr Ste C, Frederick, MD 21702

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$108,925

888 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Elizabeth Liotta of Frederick, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $108,925 across 888 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $15,562 138
2024 General $14,232 147
2023 General $12,598 155
2022 General $15,829 127
2021 General $11,911 89
2020 General $9,107 81
2019 General $29,686 151

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Elizabeth Liotta
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Elizabeth Liotta were reported at $15,562. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Elizabeth Liotta Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $29,686 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $9,107 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $11,911 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $15,829 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $12,598 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $14,232 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $15,562 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $86,321 231 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $4,785 38 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,870 67 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,805 147 payments
  5. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $2,598 27 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $1,119 54 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $746 22 payments
  8. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $734 30 payments
  9. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $724 34 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $616 17 payments
  11. Other $5,606 221 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $74,700 38 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $18,646 809 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $11,408 6 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $3,474 25 payments
  5. Education $697 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SKYRIZI Immunology $47,909 103 payments
  2. HUMIRA $24,589 75 payments
  3. SKYRIZI Immunology $12,881 21 payments
  4. RINVOQ $4,945 36 payments
  5. TREMFYA $2,941 145 payments
  6. VTAMA $2,694 32 payments
  7. COSENTYX $2,297 26 payments
  8. TALTZ $994 52 payments
  9. DUPIXENT $637 20 payments
  10. SOTYKTU $618 19 payments
  11. Other $10,997 469 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 20 drugs

Part D claims

481

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$903,843

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

28.1%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 17 $361,209
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 12 $162,859
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 18 $125,973
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 16 $102,344
Otezla Apremilast Brand 20 $97,231
Oracea Doxycycline Monohydrate Brand 12 $22,565
Doxycycline Ir-Dr Doxycycline Monohydrate Brand 17 $15,861
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 65 $4,403
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 69 $3,071
Tacrolimus Generic 22 $2,913

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 20 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 58 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$346,723

Of which drugs: $8,561

Medicare patients

1,226

Average age 75

Services billed

13,111

769 women, 457 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 68%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Diabetes 23%
Osteoporosis 22%
Depression 18%
Cancer 16%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg J7345 Office 24 6,400 $8,536
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 14 32 $25

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SKYRIZI
$11,234 17 —
TREMFYA
$430 12 —
Zoryve
$365 — —
DUPIXENT
$302 — —
RINVOQ
$271 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

888 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record