Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Elizabeth Kellam

Physician Assistant Spartanburg, SC Physician Assistant

NPI 1518381482 CMS profile 10603220

853 N Church St, Suite 720C, Spartanburg, SC 29303

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,172

145 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Elizabeth Kellam of Spartanburg, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,172 across 145 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $669 27
2024 General $955 36
2023 General $736 33
2022 General $329 21
2021 General $483 28

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Elizabeth Kellam
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Elizabeth Kellam were reported at $669. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Elizabeth Kellam Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $483 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $329 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $736 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $955 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $669 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $1,252 40 payments
  2. Dexcom, Inc. $395 21 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $312 21 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $178 9 payments
  5. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $136 6 payments
  6. Insulet Corporation $115 5 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $97 6 payments
  8. Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $89 5 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $79 5 payments
  10. Medtronic, Inc. $73 4 payments
  11. Other $446 23 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,172 145 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. FreeStyle Libre 3 $1,218 38 payments
  2. Dexcom G6 Transmitter Endocrinology $317 16 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $286 19 payments
  4. Ozempic $270 18 payments
  5. Tresiba $226 15 payments
  6. Omnipod $115 5 payments
  7. RECORLEV $89 5 payments
  8. JARDIANCE $87 5 payments
  9. DEXCOM G6 TRANSMITTER Endocrinology $78 5 payments
  10. TZIELD $75 3 payments
  11. Other $945 53 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 44 drugs

Part D claims

2,945

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$1,605,444

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

81.5%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 219 $295,213
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 124 $164,067
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 69 $129,248
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 77 $121,446
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 161 $120,629
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 137 $99,098
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 82 $85,700
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 68 $81,764
Humalog Kwikpen U-100 Insulin Lispro Brand 173 $57,091
Fiasp Flextouch Insulin Aspart (Niacinamide) Brand 52 $52,169

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 44 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 5 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$35,890

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

220

Average age 72

Services billed

847

109 women, 111 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 58%
Arthritis 41%
Ischemic heart disease 38%
Depression 32%
Heart failure 27%
Atrial fibrillation 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Qutenza
  • Averitas Pharma Inc. $35
$35 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $17
  • Lilly USA, LLC $16
$33 82 —
RECORLEV
  • Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $29
$29 — —
TZIELD
  • SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC $19
$19 — —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $12
$12 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

145 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record