Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Eitan Burstein

Glaucoma Specialist Danbury, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1558621656 CMS profile 1397345

69 Sand Pit Rd Ste 101, Danbury, CT 06810

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,211

113 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,902

Paid to them · 11 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$4,600 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2019

Through program year 2025, Eitan Burstein of Danbury, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,211 across 113 general payments and $1,902 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $4,600 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 75th percentile of Glaucoma Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $776 20
2024 General $1,875 31
2024 Research $1,902 11
2023 General $1,177 19
2022 General $446 13
2021 General $66 3
2020 General $174 14
2019 General $697 13

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Eitan Burstein
  • Glaucoma Specialist median
  • Middle half of Glaucoma Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Eitan Burstein were reported at $776. Among 370 Glaucoma Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $597 and the middle half received between $244 and $1,607.

Show as a table
Year Eitan Burstein Glaucoma Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $697 $433 $150–$1,170 $163
2020 $174 $242 $74–$693 $114
2021 $66 $324 $122–$936 $132
2022 $446 $399 $121–$1,081 $149
2023 $1,177 $458 $190–$1,208 $160
2024 $1,875 $558 $215–$1,359 $164
2025 $776 $597 $244–$1,607 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $918 26 payments
  2. Alcon Vision LLC $848 16 payments
  3. Carl Zeiss Meditec USA, Inc. $739 3 payments
  4. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $580 16 payments
  5. Glaukos Corporation $447 4 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $389 15 payments
  7. Nova Eye, Inc. $273 1 payment
  8. Sight Sciences, Inc. $174 5 payments
  9. Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limited $165 4 payments
  10. Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. $150 1 payment
  11. Other $527 22 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,553 111 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $658 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VERACITY SURGICAL $739 3 payments
  2. CIRRUS HD-OCT $739 3 payments
  3. IOLMaster 700 $739 3 payments
  4. VisuMax $739 3 payments
  5. XEN GLAUCOMA TREATMENT SYSTEM $383 3 payments
  6. STELLARIS $306 2 payments
  7. Radius XR $303 2 payments
  8. LUMIGAN $266 15 payments
  9. XEN $237 2 payments
  10. Rocklatan $217 5 payments
  11. Other $3,631 100 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,902 11 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 24 drugs

Part D claims

3,119

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$384,986

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

29.4%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 197 $110,844
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 92 $60,159
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 28 $35,656
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 66 $31,199
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 79 $23,857
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 40 $21,980
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 629 $19,291
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 75 $11,345
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 134 $9,343
Timolol Maleate Generic 351 $8,769

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 24 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 37 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$277,874

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

693

Average age 76

Services billed

2,825

402 women, 291 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 44%
Diabetes 29%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Osteoporosis 17%
Cancer 16%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Rocklatan
  • Alcon Vision LLC $181
$181 92 —
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $101
$101 197 —
VEVYE
  • Harrow Eye, LLC $20
$20 — —
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $18
$18 — —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $8
$8 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

124 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Glaucoma Specialist in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record