Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Eileen Healy

Clinical Nurse Specialist Walnut Creek, CA Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1871796581 CMS profile 10437664

96 Amigo Ln, Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,672

72 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Eileen Healy of Walnut Creek, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,672 across 72 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of Clinical Nurse Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $223 5
2024 General $206 8
2023 General $567 16
2022 General $1,094 25
2021 General $582 18

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Eileen Healy
  • Clinical Nurse Specialist median
  • Middle half of Clinical Nurse Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Eileen Healy were reported at $223. Among 490 Clinical Nurse Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $149 and the middle half received between $61 and $470.

Show as a table
Year Eileen Healy Clinical Nurse Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $582 $132 $42–$386 $132
2022 $1,094 $140 $55–$364 $149
2023 $567 $145 $50–$403 $160
2024 $206 $145 $55–$430 $164
2025 $223 $149 $61–$470 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $1,656 30 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $202 7 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $161 7 payments
  4. Bardy Diagnostics, Inc. $122 6 payments
  5. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $78 3 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $76 3 payments
  7. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $75 3 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $64 3 payments
  9. Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc. $52 1 payment
  10. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. $43 2 payments
  11. Other $143 7 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,672 72 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AZURE XT DR MRI SURESCAN $619 12 payments
  2. ADVISA DR MRI SURESCAN $262 4 payments
  3. Azure $256 3 payments
  4. Micra $250 5 payments
  5. JARDIANCE $202 7 payments
  6. VERQUVO Cardiovascular $145 6 payments
  7. OMNIASECURE MRI SURESCAN $135 1 payment
  8. Carnation Ambulatory Monitor $122 6 payments
  9. VERQUVO Cardiovascular $105 4 payments
  10. COBALT DR MRI SURESCAN $92 3 payments
  11. Other $678 28 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

72 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Nurse Specialist in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record