Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Edwin Whitney

Cardiovascular Disease San Antonio, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1669563656 CMS profile 75126

1933 Ne Loop 410, San Antonio, TX 78217

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$30,485

235 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Edwin Whitney of San Antonio, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $30,485 across 235 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $859 48
2024 General $915 29
2023 General $800 43
2022 General $617 37
2021 General $519 10
2020 General $11,617 16
2019 General $15,156 52

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Edwin Whitney
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Edwin Whitney were reported at $859. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Edwin Whitney Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $15,156 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $11,617 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $519 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $617 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $800 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $915 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $859 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $16,188 58 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $10,328 7 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $824 48 payments
  4. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $553 38 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $483 9 payments
  6. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $450 9 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $395 21 payments
  8. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $278 6 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $183 17 payments
  10. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. $156 6 payments
  11. Other $648 16 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $19,388 10 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $5,291 208 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $4,125 3 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $1,566 7 payments
  5. Education $115 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. JARDIANCE Diabetes $15,652 31 payments
  2. JARDIANCE Diabetes $7,328 5 payments
  3. TRULICITY $3,000 2 payments
  4. CYCLOSET $553 38 payments
  5. JARDIANCE Diabetes $537 27 payments
  6. XARELTO $450 9 payments
  7. LEQVIO $438 26 payments
  8. CAMZYOS $348 14 payments
  9. NEXLETOL $278 6 payments
  10. Ozempic $269 4 payments
  11. Other $2,018 85 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 117 drugs

Part D claims

13,987

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$2,424,950

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

21.6%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 469 $560,102
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 462 $545,269
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 420 $440,126
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 197 $173,075
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 90 $97,074
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 56 $83,592
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 61 $72,456
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 39 $44,004
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 61 $40,352
Colchicine Generic 586 $38,811

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 117 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$271,039

Of which drugs: $1,461

Medicare patients

997

Average age 77

Services billed

4,746

465 women, 532 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 61%
Ischemic heart disease 53%
Arthritis 51%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Heart failure 20%
Depression 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 64 253 $1,461

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $375
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $186
$561 420 —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $95
$95 — —
CYCLOSET
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $66
$66 37 —
ONPATTRO
  • Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. $60
$60 — —
CAMZYOS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $42
$42 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

235 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record