Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Edwin Parrilla

General Practice Royal Palm Beach, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1710306642 CMS profile 2780528

1440 Royal Palm Beach Blvd Ste A, Ste 335, Royal Palm Beach, FL 33411

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,367

447 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$56,445 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Edwin Parrilla of Royal Palm Beach, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,367 across 447 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $56,445 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $166 8
2024 General $280 14
2023 General $547 14
2022 General $1,191 34
2021 General $2,811 134
2020 General $2,502 135
2019 General $2,870 108

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Edwin Parrilla
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Edwin Parrilla were reported at $166. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Edwin Parrilla General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $2,870 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $2,502 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $2,811 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $1,191 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $547 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $280 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $166 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,598 111 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $1,104 60 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $997 36 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $731 41 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $692 27 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $657 35 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $647 33 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $451 11 payments
  9. Amarin Pharma Inc. $420 8 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $324 14 payments
  11. Other $1,745 71 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,350 445 payments
  2. Education $17 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,461 84 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,117 61 payments
  3. TRULICITY $740 44 payments
  4. Repatha $674 30 payments
  5. FARXIGA $616 22 payments
  6. Kerendia $451 11 payments
  7. ELIQUIS $417 19 payments
  8. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $416 26 payments
  9. JARDIANCE Diabetes $368 16 payments
  10. JARDIANCE Diabetes $330 24 payments
  11. Other $6,640 339 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 117 drugs

Part D claims

5,721

Median for General Practice: 1,105

Drug cost

$460,883

Median for General Practice: $48,734

Branded share of claims

18.2%

Median for General Practice: 17.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 59 $83,184
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 41 $54,518
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 36 $51,916
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 47 $40,203
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 39 $35,357
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 30 $30,243
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 29 $27,410
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 21 $21,775
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 24 $15,917
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 18 $15,552

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 117 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 31 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$25,663

Of which drugs: $344

Medicare patients

95

Average age 73

Services billed

593

48 women, 47 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 38%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Diabetes 31%
Heart failure 24%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Depression 24%
COPD 19%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $53
$53 — —
NEXLETOL
  • Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $46
$46 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $41
$41 36 —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $29
$29 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $17
$17 39 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

447 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other General Practice in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record