Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Edward Washabaugh

Interventional Pain Medicine Ann Arbor, MI Medical Doctor

NPI 1952409344 CMS profile 88730

710 Avis Dr Ste 200, Ann Arbor, MI 48108

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,210

280 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$2,794

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$548,868 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Edward Washabaugh of Ann Arbor, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,210 across 280 general payments and $2,794 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $548,868 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,168 50
2024 General $1,090 49
2023 General $439 22
2022 General $603 27
2022 Research $2,794 2
2021 General $1,951 45
2020 General $299 8
2019 General $4,659 79

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Edward Washabaugh
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Edward Washabaugh were reported at $1,168. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Edward Washabaugh Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $4,659 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $299 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $1,951 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $603 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $439 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $1,090 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $1,168 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Nevro Corp. $2,074 41 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,823 96 payments
  3. Medtronic, Inc. $1,368 25 payments
  4. Vertiflex, Inc. $1,257 10 payments
  5. Vertos Medical, Inc. $1,007 19 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $930 16 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $406 21 payments
  8. Bioventus LLC $186 3 payments
  9. Stimwave Technologies Incorporated $180 1 payment
  10. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $178 6 payments
  11. Other $801 42 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,281 259 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $2,918 20 payments
  3. Education $11 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $1,280 11 payments
  2. Superion ISS $1,257 10 payments
  3. INTELLIS $1,171 14 payments
  4. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $756 11 payments
  5. mild Device Kit $685 8 payments
  6. GENERAL PAIN MANAGEMENT $486 21 payments
  7. Omnia $436 11 payments
  8. BOTOX $361 18 payments
  9. Senza $358 19 payments
  10. General - Pain Management $340 18 payments
  11. Other $2,392 117 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Nevro Corp. $2,794 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

648

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$21,302

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

34.4%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Buprenorphine Generic 35 $7,533
Lyrica Pregabalin Brand 11 $6,254
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 109 $1,172
Gabapentin Generic 81 $1,168
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 23 $762
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 33 $743
Tramadol Hcl Er Tramadol Hcl Brand 13 $737
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 41 $558
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 24 $477
Pregabalin Generic 21 $450

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 100 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$264,181

Of which drugs: $17,333

Medicare patients

284

Average age 72

Services billed

37,951

162 women, 122 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Depression 38%
Diabetes 32%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Heart failure 21%
COPD 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 116 19,980 $2,012
Low osmolar contrast material, 200-299 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9966 Office 56 2,950 $848
Injection, propofol, 10 mg J2704 Office 90 4,051 $318
Injection, hydromorphone, up to 4 mg J1170 Office 12 82 $228
Infusion, normal saline solution, sterile (500 ml = 1 unit) J7040 Office 75 139 $143
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 49 550 $58
Injection, bupivicaine, not otherwise specified, 0.5 mg J0665 Office 13 3,090 $36
Injection, midazolam hydrochloride, per 1 mg J2250 Office 11 30 $3

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $123
$123 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

282 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record