Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Edward Taylor

Internal Medicine Omaha, NE Medical Doctor

NPI 1578674008 CMS profile 162792

8901 W Dodge Rd, Omaha, NE 68114

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,053

644 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Edward Taylor of Omaha, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,053 across 644 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,516 99
2024 General $1,533 92
2023 General $1,562 105
2022 General $1,410 105
2021 General $1,357 94
2020 General $155 11
2019 General $1,521 138

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Edward Taylor
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Edward Taylor were reported at $1,516. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Edward Taylor Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,521 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $155 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,357 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,410 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,562 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,533 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,516 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,018 61 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $855 73 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $679 53 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $644 57 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $526 44 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $511 54 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $491 42 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $441 17 payments
  9. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $377 24 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $365 22 payments
  11. Other $3,146 197 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,027 641 payments
  2. Education $26 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $460 26 payments
  2. Ozempic $452 37 payments
  3. QULIPTA $388 18 payments
  4. JARDIANCE $378 29 payments
  5. REXULTI $377 24 payments
  6. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $363 37 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $348 22 payments
  8. ELIQUIS $338 26 payments
  9. NURTEC ODT $327 25 payments
  10. MOUNJARO $308 23 payments
  11. Other $9,476 649 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 210 drugs

Part D claims

17,439

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,785,948

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

24.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 385 $325,133
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 332 $282,372
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 177 $197,530
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 177 $187,521
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 95 $90,374
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 76 $79,023
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 76 $75,632
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 61 $50,188
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 57 $31,141
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 28 $24,908

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 210 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 134 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$606,839

Of which drugs: $208,835

Medicare patients

882

Average age 76

Services billed

18,940

505 women, 377 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Diabetes 21%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Osteoporosis 19%
Cancer 18%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 75 7,800 $157,678
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 132 132 $36,954
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 119 119 $9,737
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 24 24 $3,667
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 30 156 $119
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 11 68 $62

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 40 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $109
$109 — —
Austedo XR
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $76
$76 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $73
$73 — —
TZIELD
  • SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC $73
$73 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $68
$68 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 40 with Patron

Records

644 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Nebraska

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record