Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Edward Mena

Hepatology Pasadena, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1881654226 CMS profile 85033

301 S Fair Oaks Ave Ste 405, Pasadena, CA 91105

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$623,998

1,484 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$37,669

Paid to them · 5 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$4,315,316 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Edward Mena of Pasadena, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $623,998 across 1,484 general payments and $37,669 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $4,315,316 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Hepatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $146,458 253
2025 Research $2,311 2
2024 General $130,159 232
2024 Research $32,488 2
2023 General $68,723 117
2022 General $74,213 168
2021 General $67,358 216
2021 Research $2,870 1
2020 General $48,915 224
2019 General $88,172 274

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Edward Mena
  • Hepatology median
  • Middle half of Hepatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Edward Mena were reported at $146,458. Among 186 Hepatology profiles paid that year, the median was $937 and the middle half received between $213 and $19,932.

Show as a table
Year Edward Mena Hepatology median Middle half National median
2019 $88,172 $1,151 $155–$15,665 $163
2020 $48,915 $1,450 $116–$10,568 $114
2021 $67,358 $1,165 $89–$8,210 $132
2022 $74,213 $546 $125–$14,024 $149
2023 $68,723 $417 $118–$7,955 $160
2024 $130,159 $619 $148–$16,504 $164
2025 $146,458 $937 $213–$19,932 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $190,040 314 payments
  2. Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $78,627 116 payments
  3. Madrigal Pharmaceuticals $77,274 117 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $59,033 206 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $46,440 84 payments
  6. Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc $43,659 42 payments
  7. Eisai Inc. $42,731 139 payments
  8. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $35,606 232 payments
  9. Novo Nordisk Inc $16,658 11 payments
  10. Dova Pharmaceuticals $11,808 23 payments
  11. Other $22,121 200 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $396,999 167 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $74,079 38 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $52,115 24 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $36,568 1,139 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $32,419 88 payments
  6. Honoraria $22,930 16 payments
  7. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $8,800 4 payments
  8. Education $88 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Epclusa $64,638 51 payments
  2. Vemlidy $57,945 44 payments
  3. MAVYRET $53,882 188 payments
  4. REZDIFFRA $53,344 95 payments
  5. Livdelzi $46,233 44 payments
  6. OCALIVA $42,895 50 payments
  7. Lenvima $42,541 137 payments
  8. ZEPBOUND $40,103 59 payments
  9. XIFAXAN $35,606 232 payments
  10. Bylvay $27,785 24 payments
  11. Other $106,674 336 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $34,799 4 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $2,870 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 61 drugs

Part D claims

5,568

Median for Undefined Physician type: 319

Drug cost

$4,282,340

Median for Undefined Physician type: $28,032

Branded share of claims

22.7%

Median for Undefined Physician type: 24.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xifaxan Rifaximin Brand 410 $1,246,671
Epclusa Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir Brand 43 $1,013,296
Vemlidy Tenofovir Alafenamide Brand 342 $529,863
Lenvima Lenvatinib Mesylate Brand 16 $365,517
Iqirvo Elafibranor Brand 22 $252,863
Ocaliva Obeticholic Acid Brand 24 $202,703
Livdelzi Seladelpar Lysine Brand 15 $189,579
Rezdiffra Resmetirom Brand 43 $170,298
Ursodiol Generic 796 $114,639
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 43 $45,169

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 61 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 138 Part D prescribers listed as Undefined Physician type; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 10 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$131,157

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

694

Average age 71

Services billed

1,456

405 women, 289 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 54%
Arthritis 53%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Depression 23%
Osteoporosis 23%
Heart failure 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REZDIFFRA
$23,560 43 —
Livdelzi
$23,390 15 —
Bylvay
$21,987 — —
ZEPBOUND
$16,080 — —
MAVYRET
$8,374 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,489 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hepatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record