Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Edward Kim

Hematology & Oncology Sacramento, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1033237987 CMS profile 138071

2279 45Th Street, Sacramento, CA 95817

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$174,067

128 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$5,809

Paid to them · 3 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$2,852,893 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Edward Kim of Sacramento, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $174,067 across 128 general payments and $5,809 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,852,893 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $35,691 30
2024 General $36,179 19
2024 Research $913 1
2023 General $60,128 34
2022 General $14,367 21
2021 General $12,658 10
2020 General $7,245 6
2019 General $7,798 8
2019 Research $4,896 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Edward Kim
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Edward Kim were reported at $35,691. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Edward Kim Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $7,798 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $7,245 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $12,658 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $14,367 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $60,128 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $36,179 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $35,691 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eisai Inc. $112,671 83 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $23,283 10 payments
  3. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $18,173 8 payments
  4. Array BioPharma Inc. $10,394 6 payments
  5. Celgene Corporation $7,685 4 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,597 9 payments
  7. Biotronik Inc. $129 5 payments
  8. Ethicon Inc. $99 1 payment
  9. Boston Scientific Corporation $19 1 payment
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $18 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $70,400 32 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $65,303 21 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $23,158 6 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $13,056 39 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $2,065 28 payments
  6. Education $87 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lenvima $112,671 83 payments
  2. TUKYSA $34,858 15 payments
  3. BRAFTOVI $16,992 9 payments
  4. Abraxane $7,685 4 payments
  5. IMFINZI $668 3 payments
  6. TAGRISSO $104 1 payment
  7. Neuwave $99 1 payment
  8. LUX-Dx Insertable Cardiac Monitor $19 1 payment
  9. KEYTRUDA $18 1 payment
  10. BioMonitor $16 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Celgene Corporation $4,896 2 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $913 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 12 drugs

Part D claims

245

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$886,566

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

62.9%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Qinlock Ripretinib Brand 12 $440,803
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 71 $321,321
Somatuline Depot Lanreotide Acetate Brand 13 $120,235
Megestrol Acetate Generic 11 $1,466
Ondansetron Hcl Generic 31 $1,108
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 11 $526
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 11 $307
Prochlorperazine Maleate Generic 25 $255
Loperamide Loperamide Hcl Brand 20 $253
Lidocaine-Prilocaine Lidocaine/Prilocaine Brand 16 $133

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 12 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 14 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$67,522

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

121

Average age 72

Services billed

763

63 women, 58 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 45%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Cancer 34%
Diabetes 33%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Depression 22%
Atrial fibrillation 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Lenvima
  • Eisai Inc. $19,227
$19,227 — —
TUKYSA
  • PFIZER INC. $16,685
$16,685 — —
KEYTRUDA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $18
$18 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

131 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record