Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Edmund Kopetz

Medical Oncology Houston, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1205920048 CMS profile 236273

1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$333,960

232 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$64,469

Paid to them · 60 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$6,365,285 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Edmund Kopetz of Houston, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $333,960 across 232 general payments and $64,469 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $6,365,285 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

13 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $68,730 58
2025 Research $17,770 14
2024 General $49,238 33
2024 Research $13,513 8
2023 General $61,699 43
2023 Research $4,345 6
2022 General $24,822 19
2022 Research $9,220 10
2021 General $52,592 23
2021 Research $14,271 16
2020 General $37,130 17
2020 Research $5,350 6
2019 General $39,748 39

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Edmund Kopetz
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Edmund Kopetz were reported at $68,730. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Edmund Kopetz Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $39,748 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $37,130 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $52,592 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $24,822 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $61,699 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $49,238 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $68,730 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $52,324 26 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $25,020 29 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $23,704 12 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $18,242 9 payments
  5. Merck KGaA $17,520 4 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $17,159 12 payments
  7. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $16,302 6 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $16,263 16 payments
  9. EMD Serono, Inc. $15,180 7 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $14,437 16 payments
  11. Other $117,809 95 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $261,332 98 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $53,939 15 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $11,109 38 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $4,478 78 payments
  5. Honoraria $1,815 1 payment
  6. Education $1,286 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BRAFTOVI $9,415 6 payments
  2. CYRAMZA $7,929 5 payments
  3. Nexavar $7,274 8 payments
  4. Erbitux Oncology $5,250 1 payment
  5. ERBITUX Oncology $4,320 1 payment
  6. Stivarga $4,089 5 payments
  7. ILARIS $4,063 1 payment
  8. JZP-815 $3,600 1 payment
  9. Non-Covered $3,150 2 payments
  10. VENTANA RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT $2,984 9 payments
  11. Other $17,190 28 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $62,450 57 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,154 2 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $865 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 1 drug

Part D claims

11

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$1

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

0%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Amlodipine Besylate Generic 11 $1

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 8 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$8,737

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

39

Average age 68

Services billed

82

16 women, 23 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Cancer 75%
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 38%
Diabetes 33%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Chronic kidney disease 33%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RYBREVANT
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $2,025
$2,025 — —
KEYTRUDA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $200
$200 — —
OPDIVO
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $10
$10 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

292 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record